History of research Eobasileus cornutus was originally described as a species of the
obsolete genus
Lefalaphodon,
L. discornatus (
Lefalaphodon is a variant of the more popular obsolete genus
Loxolophodon, resulting from a misinterpretation of a
telegram from
Edward Drinker Cope). Collected from
Haystack Mountain in the
Washakie Formation was the
holotype specimen consisting of a skull, the scapula, some vertebrae, the sacrum, the pelvis and the femur. A dispute over
Eobasileus specifically and the uintatheres more generally helped to spark the
Bone Wars between Cope and Marsh. In 1873, Marsh wrote: "Cope has endeavored to secure priority by sharp practice, and failed […] Prof. Cope's errors will continue to invite correction, but these, like his blunders, are hydra-headed, and life is really too short to spend valuable time in such an ungracious task, especially as in the present case Prof. Cope has not even returned thanks for the correction of nearly half a hundred errors[…]" The
American Naturalist declined to print this letter as a scientific article, but did publish it as an appendix; Marsh paid for its inclusion. Currently, only one species of
Eobasileus is considered valid;
E. cornutus. The species is grouped closely with
Tetheopsis (
Tetheopsis being considered a synonym of
Eobasileus by some authors) and
Uintatherium, in the family
Uintatheriidae. The below cladogram is based on that of Schoch & Lucas (1985):}}}}}}|label1=
Dinocerata}} == Description ==