Unfinished Business has been widely reviewed in the US and UK.
Jill Abramson, former executive editor of the
New York Times, reviewed the book for the Washington Post, writing, "Slaughter's case for revaluing and better compensating caregiving is compelling. . . . Slaughter makes it a point in her book to speak beyond the elite...she’s right that there is something fundamentally wrong with a society that values managing money so much more than raising children well."
The Economist wrote "Ms Slaughter has widened her conceptual lens in response to her critics. Whereas the
Atlantic article was written "for my demographic [of] highly educated, well-off women who are privileged enough to have choices in the first place",
Unfinished Business is full of voices from outside her social group." The journal
Signs devoted an online feature and the Winter 2017 issue to discussing the book, including nine responses from scholars and thinkers including
Joan C Williams and
Ai-Jen Poo. "Slaughter’s book is a pleasure to read, as is having her very considerable powers focused on work-family conflict. I fervently hope her focus on building a broad coalition and using a broad range of change levers will help her generation accomplish more than mine did. God knows we need it," Joan Williams wrote in her response.
Premilla Nadasen wrote: "Slaughter’s most important contribution is to reclaim care work as valuable. She argues that care is a universal issue that connects people across class and race lines, and that it includes not just child care but care for disabled adults and the elderly. Revaluing care, Slaughter argues, means changing the way we think, transforming our workplaces, and offering both better pay to care workers and government support for family-friendly policies." ==References==