(here, in 1948) accused Remington of being a member of her Soviet spy network According to later testimony by Remington, the espionage case that would change his life began in 1942 when he and his wife Ann started socializing with
Joseph North, editor of the communist publication,
New Masses. North was an old friend of Ann's mother. On one occasion, North invited Remington to lunch in New York City, at which time Remington was introduced to
Jacob Golos, a supposed writer working on a book about war mobilization. Remington had a follow-up meeting with Golos in March 1942, and it was then that Remington was introduced to a woman identified as "Helen Johnson", a researcher helping Golos with his book. Only years later, Remington claimed, did he learn that Helen Johnson was actually
Elizabeth Bentley. On nearly a dozen occasions in 1942 and 1943, Remington met with Bentley and supplied her with information. The two of them would meet alone outside his War Production Board office without a corroborating third person present. She testified that the meetings occurred "on street corners, park benches and in secluded restaurants." In his testimony, Remington said "he had suggested a couple of times that she come to his office, but she always had an excuse for not doing so." The material he gave her included data on U.S. airplane production and other matters pertaining to the aircraft industry, as well as some information on an experimental process for manufacturing
synthetic rubber from garbage. Remington later asserted (a) he was unaware "Helen Johnson" was connected with the Communist Party, (b) he believed she was a leftist researcher concerned whether American big business was fully aiding the Soviet war effort against
Nazi Germany, and (c) the information he supplied her was publicly available. But Bentley was a communist and an espionage agent for the
Soviet Union. In 1945, she broke with the communists and became an informer for the
FBI. She implicated a number of her contacts, including Remington. Bentley's revelations of Soviet espionage activities in the United States received a great deal of press attention. She identified more than 80 Americans—including several employees of government offices—as working for the Soviets, of whom only William Remington was still holding a government position. Acting on Bentley's information, the FBI began secret surveillance of Remington in late 1945. He was by this time disillusioned with communism and had broken off his relationships with radical organizations, and so the investigation revealed nothing of interest. In 1946, Remington was working with the
Office of War Mobilization and Reconversion. From there he transferred in March 1947 to a position with the
President's Council of Economic Advisers, where he was paid an annual salary of $10,305. Another loyalty investigation of Remington was opened early in 1948. In June, he was relieved of his duties pending the findings of that investigation. In July of that year, the
New York World-Telegram published a series of articles about Elizabeth Bentley, and the
Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations opened hearings to investigate her allegations. At these hearings, Bentley made her accusations against Remington public. He denied her allegations. The
Washington Post described him as "a boob...who was duped by clever Communist agents." At his loyalty review hearings, Remington downplayed his earlier connections with communist and leftist organizations. He said that his wife's adherence to communist doctrine was the reason for the end of their marriage. While testifying before the Senate, Bentley was protected from libel suits. When she repeated her charge on
NBC Radio's
Meet the Press that Remington was a communist, he sued her and NBC for libel. At this point, Remington's case acquired considerable notoriety. When Remington's lawyers attempted to subpoena Bentley, she could not be found. Headlines included "RED WITNESS "MISSING" AT 100-G SLANDER SUIT" and the like. When she finally reappeared, she was subpoenaed for the libel suit. She refused to testify at Remington's loyalty hearing. The Loyalty Review Board noted that the only serious evidence against Remington was "the uncorroborated statement of a woman who refuses to submit herself to cross-examination." It cleared Remington to return to his government post. The libel suit was settled out of court shortly thereafter, with NBC paying Remington $10,000. ==Second round of investigations==