For example, in an
interpretation of
first-order logic, the domain of discourse is the set of individuals over which the
quantifiers range. A
sentence such as is ambiguous if no domain of discourse has been identified. In one interpretation, the domain of discourse could be the set of
real numbers; in another interpretation, it could be the set of
natural numbers. If the domain of discourse is the set of real numbers, the sentence is false, with as counterexample; if the domain is the set of natural numbers, the sentence is true, since 2 is not the square of any natural number. The
binary relation called
set membership, expressed as x \in A, and meaning that
x belongs to set
A, is clear enough. Every binary relation has a
converse relation, and the converse of \in is written \ni. Also, a binary relation must have a
domain. The domain of the converse of set membership is the universe of discourse. Any subset of this universe may, or may not, contain
x.
A is a subset of this universe, not necessarily restricted to
A. ==See also==