Initially, Kurtén defined the ulna as belonging to no other bear species than
Ursus maritimus. At the time of the discovery, it was the largest ursine ulna ever found, leaving only two options for species classification: either famously long-legged Pleistocene
Tremarctines or the polar bear. Since no
Arctodus bear lived in
Pleistocene Britain,
Ursus maritimus was chosen as a parent taxon. In 2008,
Charles Harington stated that the identification of a polar bear is plausible based on sea level changes and ice conditions in the
North Sea of that period. Furthermore, he highlighted the presence of marine mammal fauna (including
ringed and
bearded seals) near the Kew locality, suggesting that polar bears were also present in the southern North Sea during colder periods of the Weichselian. However, Harington also noted that Andy Currant of the
Natural History Museum, London believes that fossil represents a huge
brown bear rather than a polar bear, as fauna assemblages from other contemporary British sites, also dominated by steppe bison, reindeer and wolves, preserve gigantic brown bears like the Kew Bridge bear. Andy Currant's opinion that the Kew Bridge fossil belongs to a brown bear, although referred to in a 2007
BBC interview and in studies from 2009 and 2022, awaits scientific verification. ==References==