The use of UV filters has increased recently due to growing concern about UV radiation and skin cancer, especially as a result of
ozone depletion, which in turn has caused concern for its environmental impact. Several UV filters have been detected at
ppb or
ppt levels in surface water and wastewater, with maximum concentrations in the summertime. Because most UV filters are
lipophilic, they tend to
bioaccumulate in aquatic environments and food chains originating from them. Confirming
bioaccumulation, several studies have shown the presence of UV filters in aquatic organisms. The
4-methyl-benzylidene camphor was detected in the muscle tissue of trout in Swiss and German waters, while traces of
Ethylhexyl methoxycinnamate and
octocrylene were found in shellfish in the Mediterranean and Atlantic coasts of France. Furthermore, eighteen organic sunscreens were found in sediments of Japanese rivers and lakes, at concentrations ranging from 2 to about 3000 ng/g. The accumulation of organic UV filters in living organisms is of major concern because some of them (and their
metabolites) can act as
endocrine disruptors both in vitro and in vivo. Also, Goksøyr et al. (2009) reported concentrations of organic UV-filters in open waters of the Pacific Ocean, providing evidence of the persistence and wide dispersion of these components in the marine environment. Because UV-filters are not always stable under environmental conditions, it is common for them to transform into other compounds. Water in natural reservoirs, for example, is subjected to sun irradiation, while swimming-pool water is often disinfected by
chlorination,
bromination,
ozonation, or
UV irradiation. These byproducts can often be more toxic than the original UV filter. For example,
avobenzone transforms in the presence of chlorinated disinfection products and UV radiation, producing substituted chlorinated
phenols and
acetophenones, which are known for their toxicity. H2O2 is responsible for damaging
lipids,
proteins, and
DNA, and generating high stress levels in marine organisms. Inorganic UV-filters (i.e. TiO2) can also generate ROS, another compound toxic for marine
phytoplankton.
Coral bleaching '' (hard coral) with signs of bleaching or crown-of-thorns starfish damage UV filters have shown severe effects on coral reefs due to the
bleaching of corals at very low concentrations. As a result, small quantities of sunscreens result in the production of large amounts of coral mucus within 18-48 hrs and bleaching of hard corals within 96 hrs. Among the UV filters that result in coral bleaching according to studies are Ethylhexyl methoxycinnamate,
benzophenone-3, and
4-methyl benzylidene camphor, even in very low concentrations. Bleaching was favored by higher temperatures which act as synergistic factors. Experiments showed that the coral bleaching was not dose-dependent, so it can occur upon exposure to very small amounts. According to the rough estimate of 78 million tourists per year in coral reef areas, the estimated amount of sunscreen used annually in tropical countries ranges between 16,000 and 25,000 tons. 25% of this amount is washed off during bathing activities, leading to a release of 4,000-6,000 tons/year in the reef areas. This results in threatening 10% of the world reefs by sunscreen induced coral bleaching alone. Sunscreens can significantly enhance viral production in seawater. ==Mechanisms of transformation==