Subjectively invalid names are names that have been rendered invalid by individual scientific judgement or opinion. Taxonomists may differ in their opinion, and names considered invalid by one researcher may be considered valid by another. They include: :*
Junior subjective synonyms –
synonyms described from different
types, which were previously described as separate
taxa, but are now believed to be the same taxon. The junior name is treated as invalid only so long as the two names are considered to refer to the same taxon, which is a subjective opinion. :*Junior secondary homonyms – In this case, the taxa are separate species, originally described in separate genera, but with the same
specific name; if they are later placed in the same genus, this results in the species names being
homonyms, and generally only the senior homonym can be valid. The junior name is treated as invalid only so long as the two taxa are considered to belong to the same genus, which is a subjective opinion. However, if a name became a secondary homonym prior to 1961, and was replaced by a new name, the original name may be permanently invalid. :*Conditionally suppressed names – these are special cases where the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature has ruled that a name can only be valid under certain conditions (e.g., when it is
not considered a synonym of a name that is junior to it), but is otherwise to be suppressed. This is usually because the
junior synonym (the later name) has had far wider and far longer common usage than the
senior synonym (the older name). == Objectively invalid names ==