From contemporary reviews, a reviewer in
Variety stated that the film will "never get out of the B league", noting a "un-zombie-like zombie and a fairly horrorless story, despite half a dozen murders." and that the "scripting features all the horror-whodunnit cliches." The review noted the "photography is better than fair" and the inclusion of
Ian Keith and other experienced supporting actors "brings thesping up to a good B level." From retrospective reviews, Ronald V. Borst of
Photon noted that "throughout the picture a great many cliches are present" noting that the screenplay was basically a reworking of the
Warner Bros. film
The Return of Dr. X (1939). The film praised some elements, namely its "darkly photographed settings, its musical score, and the surprisingly well-played performance by Ian Keith." concluding that the film is "neither a gem nor a bomb, but is enjoyable, even today." film historian Tom Weaver stated that like many films written for
Republic Pictures,
Valley of the Zombiess script did not "know how monsters worked", noting that the writers didn't see much difference between zombies and vampires. Don Willis, author of the
Horror and Science Fiction Films series declared that the film had "no thrills" and was "always cliched, sometimes cloddish dialogue" while finding the leads "mildly amusing." Weaver noted that Ford and cinematographer Reggie Lanning added "solid contributions to the ominous atmosphere", but that the main issue was that
Robert Livingston and
Adrian Booth were both often had dialogue that was meant to be clever or cute but was rarely anything clever or witty about it. Weaver concluded that the film was probably corny by 1940s standards, and was "just another
b movie in a world overfilled with them." == References ==