The great green macaw belongs to the
genus Ara, which includes other large parrots, such as the
scarlet macaw, the
military macaw, and the
blue-and-yellow macaw. This bird was first described and illustrated in 1801 by the French naturalist
François Le Vaillant for his
Histoire Naturelle Des Perroquets under the name "le grand Ara militaire", using a skin deposited at the
Muséum national d'histoire naturelle in
Paris. Le Vaillant states that it is not certain if the bird is truly a distinct species of parrot, or, as he thinks more likely, it is specific varietal race of the military macaw, but nonetheless, he must mention that its existence merits notice. The bird was subsequently named
Psittacus ambiguus by the
Thuringian
Johann Matthäus Bechstein in the first tome of the fourth volume, published in 1811, of the series ''Johann Latham's Allgemeine Uebersicht der Vögel'', the greatly expanded
German translation of the Englishman
John Latham's
A General Synopsis of Birds. Bechstein mentions le Vaillant's reluctance to consider it as an independent species, but explains that having examined a living bird, he considers it a valid species, mentioning the size difference and enumerating numerous other characteristics he deems distinctive. After almost 200 years, the
binomial name was changed from
Ara ambigua to
Ara ambiguus in 2004, as it was decided that the word
ara was in fact
male, despite ending in an -
a (see
epicene). There are two subspecies which are
geographically isolated at present:
Ara ambiguus ssp.
ambiguus, which has the largest distribution range (
Central and northern
South America), and
Ara ambiguus ssp.
guayaquilensis, which only occurs in Ecuador. The Ecuadorian subspecies is sometimes referred to as '''Chapman's macaw
or Chapman's green macaw'''. Due to the morphological variability of ssp.
guayaquilensis, with a number of specimens of this taxon being identifiable as the military macaw, in 1996 Berg and Horstman, themselves referencing Fjeldså
et al.., mentioned it might best be synonymised with
A. militaris, or suggested there might be gene-flow between all three populations. A 2015 study comparing the
mitochondrial DNA of different populations of the military macaw and this species found that while these two species are clearly differentiated, as well as different populations of the military macaw in Mexico, no genetic difference between ssp.
guayaquilensis and the
nominate taxon was found (at least regarding the mitochondria). This indicates that the division of this species into two subspecies is likely not taxonomically valid. It is also possible that the Ecuadorian populations do not all belong to ssp.
guayaquilensis. ==Description==