The usual view of scholars is that the painting was commissioned to celebrate a marriage, and is a relatively uncomplicated representation of sensual pleasure, with an added meaning of love conquering or outlasting war. This was a commonplace in Renaissance thinking, which might be elaborated in terms of
Renaissance Neoplatonism. As with the other mythologies,
Ernst Gombrich and
Edgar Wind were the first to analyse the painting in these terms. The couple's relationship could also be considered in terms of
astrology, in which Mars is, according to
Marsilio Ficino, "outstanding in strength among the planets, because he makes men stronger, but Venus masters him ...she seems to master Mars, but Mars never masters Venus". The Victorian critic
John Addington Symonds, without disagreeing with that interpretation, thought the newly fashionable Botticelli overrated and "harboured an irrational dislike for the picture", writing that "The face and attitude of that unseductive Venus... opposite her snoring lover, seems to symbolize the indignities which women have to endure from insolent and sottish boys with only youth to recommend them." One dissenting interpretation is from Charles Dempsey, who finds a more sinister meaning in the picture, with the little satyrs as
incubi who torment sleepers, provoking "sexual terrors in the dreams of those bound in a state of sensual error and confusion." He concludes that "The idea of love here invested in Venus seems to be revealed, not in a positive celebration of the spirit animating natural life shown in the
Primavera and
Birth of Venus but as an empty sensual fantasy that disarms and torments the slumbering spirit of a once virile martial valour. The work is agreed by all to draw on the description by
Lucian, a poet in Greek of the 2nd-century AD, of a famous painting, now lost, by
Echion of the wedding ceremony of
Alexander the Great and
Roxana. The ancient painting probably adapted
iconography associated with Venus and Mars to the historical Alexander and his bride. Lucian's
ekphrasis or description mentions
amoretti or
putti playing with Alexander's armour during the ceremony, two carrying his lance and one who has crawled inside his breastplate. This is taken both as evidence of Botticelli's collaboration with Humanist advisors with the full classical education that he lacked, and his keenness to recreate the lost wonders of ancient painting, a theme in the interpretation of several of his secular works, most clearly in the
Calumny of Apelles, which also uses Lucian. A
Roman sarcophagus in the Vatican is carved with a similar Mars and Venus reclining, accompanied by
putti. The position of the main figures reflects the description of them by
Lucretius in
de rerum natura ("
The Nature of Things"): "though Mars the War Lord rules war’s savage works, yet often he throws himself into your arms, faint with love’s deathless wound, and there, with arching neck bent back, looks up and sighs, and feeds a lustful eye on you and, pillowed, dangles his life’s breath from your lips. Then, as he falls back on your sacred body, Lady, lean over and let sweet utterance pour from your holy lips—a plea of peace for Rome." In 2010, the plant held by the satyr in the bottom right corner of the painting was tentatively identified by the art historian David Bellingham as the fruit of
Datura stramonium or thorn apple. This plant, often referred to as "poor man's acid", has properties likened to a mixture of
opium and
alcohol, and may cause fainting or drowsiness as its effects wear off. Others question how this plant, normally considered a native only of North America, might have reached Italy by the 1480s, and dismiss the idea. However, in 2017 the National Gallery website endorsed the identification as a "thorn apple". Bellingham suggests that the growing plant in the bottom right corner is a species of
aloe, credited by the Greeks with medicinal powers, as well as offering protection against evil spirits and enhancing sexual excitement. Bellingham proposes several layers of identification for the figures, generating different meanings. These include the couple as
Adam and Eve. ==Possible models==