In a report on an article in
Nature, co-author Daniel E. Lieberman (whose research was partially funded by Vibram) stated that "People who wear conventional running shoes tend to run with a significantly different
strike than those who run in minimalist shoes or barefoot. More specifically, the ball of the foot should strike the ground before the heel when running (or walking) barefoot or in minimalist shoes. By landing on the middle or front of the foot, barefoot runners have almost no impact collision." Lieberman has "emphasized that his research does not include data on injury or show that barefoot running is better for you" but that it is "a reasonable hypothesis that needs to be tested". Lieberman et al.'s study was an experiment that involved five groups of runners from
Kenya and the
United States. The two American groups were adult athletes who had run with shoes since childhood, and those who habitually
run barefoot or with minimal footwear such as Vibram FiveFingers (mentioned by name in the study). The three Kenyan groups were adults who had never run in shoes until late adolescence, as well as two teenage groups: those that habitually wore shoes and those that always ran barefoot. The runners were instructed to run over a
force plate that was embedded in a 25-meter track, and were recorded during the run using a three-dimensional infrared kinematic system. These measurements were used to assess the pattern with which the foot strikes the ground and how forcibly it does so.
Health effects Barefoot running, which is similar to running with FiveFingers on, appears to decrease the risk of ankle sprain and
plantar fasciitis. If not conditioned slowly enough, especially when transitioning away from heelstrike running or from wearing shoes with an elevated heel, the sole of the foot or
plantar fascia can become inflamed or damaged with activity. It recommended transition to use of the shoe be very slow and gradual.
Lawsuits In 2012, an initial lawsuit was filed against Vibram over claims made about their FiveFingers minimalist shoe. Vibram claimed that the shoe "reduce[s] foot injuries and strengthen[s] foot muscles". The claim was based on Gert-Peter Brüggemann research accepted at the 2005 Conference for the International Society of Biomechanics. While Vibram has "expressly" denied "any actual or potential fault ... or liability", on May 7, 2014, it was announced that company has moved to settle the suit and agreed to set aside $3.75 million to pay refunds of up to $94 to anyone who had purchased the product since March 21, 2009. In 2015, the family of deceased Ethiopian Olympic runner
Abebe Bikila filed a lawsuit against Vibram for using and trademarking the Bikila name without permission. The suit was dismissed in 2016 on the basis that the Bikila family unreasonably delayed in seeking to enforce their rights. The family had become aware of Vibram's use of the Bikila name in 2011. Following the dismissal, the Bikila family's attorney stated that "Vibram has never asked the Bikila Family for permission, nor compensated them for using Abebe Bikila’s personality." == See also ==