Initial observations During the
third global pandemic of cholera (1846–1860), there was extensive scientific research to understand the etiology of the disease. The
miasma theory, which posited that infections spread through contaminated air, was no longer a satisfactory explanation. The English physician
John Snow was the first to give convincing evidence in London in 1854 that cholera was spread from drinking water – a contagion, not miasma. Yet he could not identify the pathogens, which made most people still believe in the miasma origin.
V. cholerae was first observed and recognized under microscope by the French zoologist
Félix-Archimède Pouchet. In 1849, Pouchet examined the stool samples of four people having cholera. His presentation before the
French Academy of Sciences on 23 April was recorded as: "[Pouchet] could verify that there existed in these [cholera patients] dejecta an immense quantity of microscopic
infusoria." As summarised in the Gazette medicale de Paris (1849, p 327), in a letter read at the 23 April 1849 meeting of the
Paris Academy of Sciences, Pouchet announced that the organisms were
infusoria, a name then used for microscopic
protists, naming them as the '
Vibrio rugula of Mueller and Shrank', a species of
protozoa described by Danish naturalist
Otto Friedrich Müller in 1786.
Identification of the bacterium An Italian physician,
Filippo Pacini, while investigating cholera outbreak in Florence in the late 1854, identified the causative pathogen as a new type of bacterium. He performed autopsies of corpses and made meticulous microscopic examinations of the tissues and body fluids. From feces and
intestinal mucosa, he identified many comma-shaped bacilli. Reporting his discovery before the Società Medico-Fisica Fiorentina (Medico-Physician Society of Florence) on 10 December, and published in the 12 December issue of the
Gazzetta Medica Italiana (
Medical Gazette of Italy), Pacini stated:Pacini thus introduced the name
vibrioni (Latin
vībro means "to move rapidly to and fro, to shake, to agitate"). A
Catalan physician Joaquim Balcells i Pascual also reported such bacterium around the same time. The discovery of the new bacterium was not regarded as medically important as the bacterium was not directly attributed to cholera. Pacini also stated that there was no reason to say that the bacterium caused the disease since he failed to create a pure culture and perform experiments, which was necessary 'to attribute the quality of contagion to cholera'.
Rediscovery The medical importance and relationship between the bacterium and the cholera disease was discovered by German physician
Robert Koch. In August 1883, Koch, with a team of German physicians, went to Alexandria, Egypt, to investigate the cholera epidemic there. Koch found that the intestinal mucosa of people who died of cholera always had the bacterium, yet he could not confirm if it was the causative agent. He moved to Calcutta (now Kolkata), India, where the epidemic was more severe. It was from here that he isolated the bacterium in a pure culture on 7 January 1884. He subsequently confirmed that the bacterium was a new species, and described it as "a little bent, like a comma." Although Koch was convinced that the bacterium was the cholera pathogen, he could not entirely procure critical evidence that the bacterium produced the symptoms in healthy subjects (an important element in what was later known as
Koch's postulates). His experiment on animals using his pure bacteria culture did not lead to the appearance of the disease in any of the subjects, and he correctly deduced that animals are immune to the human pathogen. The bacterium was by then known as "the comma bacillus." It was only in 1959, in Calcutta, that Indian physician
Sambhu Nath De isolated the cholera toxin and showed that it caused cholera in healthy subjects, hence fully proving the bacterium-cholera relationship.
Taxonomy Pacini had used the name "
vibrio cholera", without proper
binomial rendering, for the name of the bacterium. Following Koch's description, a scientific name
Bacillus comma was popularised. But an Italian bacteriologist Vittore Trevisan published in 1884 that Koch's bacterium was the same as that of Pacini's and introduced the name
Bacillus cholerae. A German physician
Richard Friedrich Johannes Pfeiffer renamed it as
Vibrio cholerae in 1896. In 1964, Rudolph Hugh of the George Washington University School of Medicine proposed to use the genus
Vibrio with the type species
V. cholerae (Pacini 1854) as a permanent name of the bacterium, regardless of the same name for protozoa. It was accepted by the
Judicial Commission of the International Committee on Bacteriological Nomenclature in 1965, and the
International Association of Microbiological Societies in 1966. == Characteristics ==