Environmental theory The environmental theory posits that the location and context of the crime bring the victim of the crime and its perpetrator together. Research published between 2010 and 2025 gives some credence to this theory. Studies in the early 2010s showed that crime is negatively correlated with trees in urban environments; more trees in an area are associated with lower victimization or violent crime rates. This relationship was established by studies in 2010 in
Portland, Oregon and in 2012 in
Baltimore, Maryland. Conversely, a study in the 2020s, showed a strong positive correlation between
vacant, abandoned, or "cited" properties with
family violence. Researchers at
Tulane University found about
child neglect and
intimate partner violence (IPV) that: Contrary to the popular belief that more women are repeat victims, and thus more victim-prone than men, actually men in their prime (15- to 34-year-old males) are more likely to be victims of repeated crimes. In the case of juvenile offenders, the study results also show that people are more likely to be victimized as a result of a serious offense by someone they know; the most frequent crimes committed by adolescents towards someone they know were sexual assault, common assault, and homicide. Adolescents victimizing people they did not know generally committed common assault, forcible confinement, and armed or unarmed robbery. Sex workers are, anecdotally, thought to have an abnormally high incidence of violent crime committed against them, and such crimes frequently go unresolved, but there are few victimological studies of the matter.
Fundamental attribution error In
social psychology, the
fundamental attribution error (also known as
correspondence bias or
attribution effect) describes the tendency to over-value
dispositional or personality-based explanations for the observed
behaviors of others while under-valuing situational explanations for those behaviors. The term was coined by
Lee Ross some years after a now-classic experiment by
Edward E. Jones and Victor Harris (1967). The fundamental attribution error is most visible when people explain others' behavior. It does not explain interpretations of one's own behavior, in which situational factors are often taken into account. This discrepancy is called the
actor–observer bias. As a simple example, if Alice saw Bob trip over a rock and fall, Alice might consider Bob to be clumsy or careless (dispositional). If Alice later tripped over the same rock herself, she would be more likely to blame the placement of the rock (situational). Victim proneness or
victim blaming can be a form of fundamental attribution error, and more specifically, the
just-world phenomenon. The just-world phenomenon or
Just-world fallacy is the belief that people get what they deserve and deserve what they get, which was first theorized by
Melvin Lerner (1977). Attributing failures to dispositional causes rather than situational causes, which are unchangeable and uncontrollable, satisfies our need to believe that the world is fair and we have control over our life. We are motivated to see a just world because this reduces our perceived threats, gives us a sense of security, helps us find meaning in difficult and unsettling circumstances, and benefits us psychologically. Unfortunately, the just-world fallacy also results in a tendency for people to blame and disparage victims of a tragedy or an accident, such as victims of
rape and
domestic abuse to reassure themselves of their insusceptibility to such events. People may even blame the victim's faults in "past lives" to justify their bad outcome. == Victim facilitation ==