The Vilama caldera is the source of the Vilama ignimbrite, which covers a surface of more than and was erupted concurrently with the collapse and formation of the caldera. The eruption occurred between 8.48.5 million years ago, but with substantial scatter of the radiometric dates which according to Soler
et al. 2007 may be due to excess
argon contaminating
biotites and thus resulting in spurious age data. Based on the characteristics of the ignimbrite, the eruption was likely triggered by the failure of the
magma chamber roof and subsequent onset of vigorous fountaining of ignimbrites through vents formed in the magma chamber roof; similar eruption conditions have been inferred for other Altiplano-Puna ignimbrites. The eruption may have taken the form of a
Plinian eruption, an unusual occurrence for Altiplano-Puna caldera collapse events. The ignimbrite is often welded and displays joint features. It is rich in crystals but has little
lithic and
pumiceous content and few
fiamme. The entire ignimbrite contains
phenocrysts with sizes reaching about of length. Detailed descriptions of the ignimbrite were provided by Soler
et al. 2007. Inside the caldera, the Vilama ignimbrite was emplaced as several flow units which are usually thick; some units reach thicknesses of . These units together are at least thick and form a uniform layer of densely welded ignimbrites with poorly preserved pumice and lithic fragments. The ignimbrite deposit inside the caldera shows evidence of flow forms and alteration by vapour interactions. Outside of the caldera, the ignimbrite is formed by two different cooling units with distinct characteristics. The lower cooling unit is massive, poorly welded and contains lithics and pumices; the content of these varies at different sites and there are several different types of pumices. The thickness of the lower cooling unit varies between to exceeding , and pre-existent topography has controlled the emplacement of the unit; it crops out mainly in valleys. The upper cooling unit is thicker and covers a larger surface than the lower unit, although part of the latter may be buried beneath the upper cooling unit. The upper cooling unit was emplaced on a flat surface as a uniform deposit with thicknesses ranging from in its southern sector to north. The upper cooling unit is itself subdivided into a basal and an upper section; the basal section is strongly welded sometimes to the point of being
vitrophyric with few
fiamme and
lithic fragments, whereas the upper section is poorly welded and light brown to pink in colour, with columnar jointing. A transitional area separates the thick upper unit with moderate quantities of lithics and fiamme from the lower unit. The two cooling units may have formed under different eruption conditions: High fountains may be the source of the lower cooling unit and lower and less stable fountains that of the upper cooling unit. The Vilama ignimbrite also includes other ignimbrites that were formerly considered to be separate ignimbrites, such as the Capaderos ignimbrite, Ceja Grande ignimbrite, Tobas Coruto, Tobas Lagunillas 1, Tobas Lagunillas 2, Tobas Lagunillas 3, Tobas Loromayu 1, Tobas Lupi Gera and Toloma ignimbrite. The inclusion of these volcanic products into the Vilama ignimbrite was based on the similarity between their characteristics and those of the actual Vilama ignimbrite, including
paleomagnetic and petrologic traits, and together they establish an ignimbrite field elongated towards the south and northwest away from the caldera. The outcrops cover an area of . The total volume of the ignimbrite is difficult to constrain as much of it is not exposed and the shape of the caldera where large parts of the ignimbrite ponded is poorly known, but may range from between to , with most of it being contained within the caldera. Based on such sizes, the caldera-forming eruption is considered to be a
supereruption with a
volcanic explosivity index of 8 and Vilama caldera is thus a
supervolcano. Fracchia
et al. 2010 further proposed that the "Pululus ignimbrite" which forms the southeast of Vilama is actually a section of the Vilama ignimbrite, which was later uplifted by a
dacitic intrusion. Additionally, it has been proposed that the Sifon ignimbrite, which was erupted 8.33 ± 0.06 million years ago, may originate in the Vilama caldera. Volcanic activity continued at Vilama after the caldera collapse, driven by a relatively quick recovery of the magmatic system after the formation of the caldera, and resulted in the formation of the resurgent dome. Among the products of this volcanism are the 58.1 ± 0.6 million year old northerly Khastor domes and stratovolcano, the 68.4 ± 0.6 million year old eastern centres (Cerro Alcoak, Cerro Salle, Bayo dome and the Vilama and Toloma lavas) and the less than 8.4 million years old Mesada Negra lavas on the resurgent dome. The Vitichi domes are of
Pliocene age. At Cerro Vilama volcanic activity continued into the
Pleistocene, with
potassium-argon dating yielding dates of 1.2 ± 0.1 and 900,000 ± 30,000 years ago.
Magnetotelluric imaging of the area has identified a low electrical conductivity anomaly beneath the caldera, which may be a solidified magma body. Originally, the Granada ignimbrite was also considered to be a product of an earlier eruption of the Vilama caldera; later research indicated that it has its own eruptive centre at
Abra Granada that is unrelated to Vilama. According to this older theory of caldera history, the Granada ignimbrite was the first stage of caldera formation, with the second stage generating the Vilama ignimbrite proper. This theory also envisaged two later stages of activity, the first linked to the
Cerro Morado mafic volcanics and the Salle and Ceja Grande ignimbrites, while the fourth produced the Bonanza ignimbrite from the Coruto caldera as well as additional volcanoes including
Cerro Zapaleri. == References ==