Historical context The moderately successful architect and engineer
Vitruvius lived from BCE, primarily in the
Roman Republic. He is best known for authoring (
On Architecture), later called the
Ten Books on Architecture, which is the only substantial architecture treatise that survives from antiquity. The work's third volume includes a discussion concerning
body proportions, where the figures of a man in a circle and a square are respectively referred to as , . Vitruvius explained that: 19th-century historians often postulated that Leonardo had no substantial inspiration from the ancient world, propagating his stance as a "modern genius" who rejected all of classicism. This has been heavily disproven by many documented accounts from Leonardo's colleagues or records of him either owning, reading, and being influenced by writings from antiquity. The treatise of Vitruvius was long kept obscurely in monk's manuscript copies, but "rediscovered" in the 15th century by
Poggio Bracciolini among works such as
De Rerum natura. Many artists then attempted to design figures which would satisfy Vitruvius' description, with the earliest being three such images by
Francesco di Giorgio Martini around the 1470s. Leonardo may have been influenced by the architect
Giacomo Andrea, with whom he records as having dined, in 1490. Andrea created his own Vitruvian Man drawing that year, which was unknown to scholars until the 1980s. De Architectura030.jpg|A
Vitruvian Man depiction in the edition of by
Vitruvius; illustrated edition by
Cesare Cesariano, 1521 File:FGMartini1.jpg|One of
Francesco di Giorgio Martini's three attempts at creating the ideal "Vitruvian Man" File:Vitruvian Man by Giacomo Andrea.jpg|A "Vitruvian Man" prototype by
Giacomo Andrea, 1490
Creation Leonardo's version of the
Vitruvian Man corrected inaccuracies in Vitruvius's account, particularly related to the head, due to use of book two of the
De pictura by
Leon Battista Alberti. Earlier drawings of the same subject "assumed that the circle and square should be centered around the navel", akin to Vitruvius's account, while Leonardo made the scheme work by using the man's genitals as the center of the square, and the navel as the center of the circle. It is likely that Leonardo's drawings dated to 1487–1490, and entitled
The proportions of the arm, were related to the
Vitruvian Man, possibly serving as preparatory sketches. Some commentators have speculated that Leonardo incorporated the
golden ratio in the drawing, possibly due to his illustrations of
Luca Pacioli's
Divina proportione, partially plagiarized from
Piero della Francesca, concerning the ratio. However, the
Vitruvian Man is likely to have been drawn before Leonardo met Pacioli, and there has been doubt over the accuracy of such an observation. As architectural scholar Vitor Murtinho explains, a circle tangent to the base of a square, with the radius and square sides related by the golden ratio, would pass exactly through the top two corners of the square, unlike Leonardo's drawing. He suggests instead constructions based on a
regular octagon or on the
vesica piscis. Leonardo's drawing is almost always dated to around 1490 during his
first Milanese period. The exact dating is not completely agreed upon and earlier generations of art historians, including
Arthur E. Popham, frequently dated the work anywhere from 1485 to 1490. Two leading art historians differ in this respect;
Martin Kemp gives , while
Carmen C. Bambach contends that the earliest possible date—which "one may not entirely discount"—is 1488. Bambach, in addition to Pedretti, Giovanna Nepi Scirè and Annalisa Perissa Torrini give a slightly broader range of . Bambach explains that this range fits "best with the manner of exact, engraving-like parallel hatching contained within robust pen-and-ink outlines, over traces of lead paint, stylus-ruling, and compass composition".
Provenance After Leonardo's death, the drawing most likely passed to his student
Francesco Melzi (1491–1570), who was
bequeathed most of Leonardo's possessions. From then on, the drawing's provenance history is almost certain: it found its way to
Cesare Monti (1594–1650), was passed to his heir Anna Luisa Monti, then to the De Page family, first (in 1777) and then his son Gaudenzio de Page. While owned by the elder De Page, he convinced the engraver Carlo Giuseppe Gerli to publish a book of Leonardo's drawings, which would be the first widespread dissemination of the
Vitruvian Man and many other Leonardo drawings. The younger de Page sold the drawing to
Giuseppe Bossi, who described, discussed, and illustrated it in the fourth chapter of his 1810 monograph on Leonardo's
The Last Supper, (
On The Last Supper of Leonardo da Vinci). This chapter was published as a stand-alone study the next year (
On the opinions of Leonardo da Vinci regarding the symmetry of human bodies). After Bossi's death in 1815, the drawing was sold to the abbot Luigi Celotti in 1818, and entered into the Venetian
Gallerie dell'Accademia's collection in 1822, where it has since remained. Because of its high artistic quality and its well-recorded history of provenance, Leonardo's authorship of the
Vitruvian Man has never been doubted. The
Vitruvian Man is rarely displayed as extended exposure to light would cause fading; it is kept on the fourth floor of the Gallerie dell'Accademia, in a locked room. In 2019, the
Louvre requested to borrow the drawing for their monumental
Léonard de Vinci exhibition, which celebrated the 500th anniversary of the artist's death. They faced substantial resistance from the heritage group
Italia Nostra, who contended that the drawing was too fragile to be transported, and filed a lawsuit. At a hearing on 16 October 2019, a judge ruled that the group had not proven their claim, but set a maximum amount of light for the drawing to be exposed to as well as a subsequent rest period to offset its overall exposure to light. The Louvre promised to lend paintings by
Raphael to Italy for his own 500th death anniversary; Italy's Minister for Cultural Affairs
Dario Franceschini stated that "Now a great cultural operation can start between Italy and France on the two exhibitions about Leonardo in France and Raphael in Rome."
Legal dispute In 2022, the Gallerie dell'Accademia, which owns the drawing, sued German jigsaw puzzle manufacturer
Ravensburger for reproducing the artwork in one of the company's jigsaw puzzles. Ravensburger started selling the 1,000-piece jigsaw puzzle in Italy in 2009 and in 2019 the museum sent the company a
cease-and-desist letter and demanded 10% of the revenue. Ravensburger refused to comply and subsequently was sued by the museum under Italy's 2004 which governs reproductions of works deemed to be under Italy's cultural heritage. In its objections, the German company claimed that it had the right to reproduce the artwork because it was already in the
public domain for centuries, and that the reproduction had occurred outside Italy and thus was not subject to Italy's Cultural Heritage Code. An Italian court rejected Ravensburger's arguments and decided in favor of the museum. In a ruling dated 17 November 2022, the court ordered the puzzle company to cease producing the product for commercial purposes and levied a fine of 1,500 euros for every day that the company failed to comply. In March 2024, a German court ruled in favor of the company, stating that the Cultural Heritage Code is not applicable outside Italy, and therefore a violation of the sovereignty of the individual states. In response, an Italian government official argues they will challenge this "abnormal" German ruling even before the European and international courts. Licensing fees for famous artworks are an important source of income for Italian museums, and Italian law says that museums owning famous public domain works hold the copyright on those works forever and can control who is allowed to make copies and derivative works of them. ==Legacy==