• The term on the left-hand side is the
material derivative of the vorticity vector . It describes the rate of change of vorticity of the moving fluid particle. This change can be attributed to
unsteadiness in the flow (, the
unsteady term) or due to the motion of the fluid particle as it moves from one point to another (, the
convection term). • The term on the right-hand side describes the stretching or tilting of vorticity due to the flow velocity gradients. Note that is a vector quantity, as is a scalar differential operator, while is a nine-element tensor quantity. • The term describes
stretching of vorticity due to flow compressibility. It follows from the Navier-Stokes equation for
continuity, namely \begin{align} \frac{\partial\rho}{\partial t} + \nabla \cdot\left(\rho \mathbf u\right) &= 0 \\ \Longleftrightarrow \nabla \cdot \mathbf{u} &= -\frac{1}{\rho}\frac{d\rho}{dt} = \frac{1}{v}\frac{dv}{dt} \end{align} where is the
specific volume of the fluid element. One can think of as a measure of flow compressibility. Sometimes the negative sign is included in the term. • The term is the
baroclinic term. It accounts for the changes in the vorticity due to the intersection of density and pressure surfaces. • The term , accounts for the diffusion of vorticity due to the viscous effects. • The term provides for changes due to external body forces. These are forces that are spread over a three-dimensional region of the fluid, such as
gravity or
electromagnetic forces. (As opposed to forces that act only over a surface (like
drag on a wall) or a line (like
surface tension around a
meniscus).
Simplifications • In case of
conservative body forces, . • For a
barotropic fluid, . This is also true for a constant density fluid (including incompressible fluid) where . Note that this is not the same as an
incompressible flow, for which the barotropic term cannot be neglected. • This note seems to be talking about the fact that conservation of momentum says {{math|1=\frac{D \rho}{D t} + \rho (\nabla \cdot \mathbf u) = \frac{\partial \rho}{\partial t} + \mathbf u \cdot \nabla \rho + \rho (\nabla \cdot \mathbf u) = 0}} and there's a difference between assuming that ρ=constant (the 'incompressible fluid' option, above) and that \nabla \cdot \mathbf u = 0 (the 'incompressible flow' option, above). With the first assumption, conservation of momentum implies (for non-zero density) that \nabla \cdot \mathbf u = 0 ; whereas the second assumption doesn't necessary imply that ρ is constant. This second assumption only strictly requires that the time rate of change of the density is compensated by the gradient of the density, as in:{{math|1=\frac{\partial \rho}{\partial t} = - \mathbf u \cdot \nabla \rho}}. You can make sense of this by considering the ideal gas law (which is valid if the Reynolds number is large enough that viscous friction becomes unimportant). Then, even for an adiabatic, chemically-homogenous fluid, the density can vary when the pressure changes, e.g. with Bernoulli. • For
inviscid fluids, the viscosity tensor is zero. Thus for an inviscid, barotropic fluid with conservative body forces, the vorticity equation simplifies to : \frac{D}{Dt} \left( \frac{\boldsymbol \omega}{\rho} \right) = \left( \frac{\boldsymbol\omega}{\rho} \right) \cdot \nabla \mathbf u Alternately, in case of incompressible, inviscid fluid with conservative body forces, : \frac{D \boldsymbol \omega}{Dt} = \frac{\partial \boldsymbol \omega}{\partial t} + (\mathbf u \cdot \nabla)\boldsymbol \omega = (\boldsymbol \omega \cdot \nabla) \mathbf u For a brief review of additional cases and simplifications, see also. For the vorticity equation in turbulence theory, in context of the flows in oceans and atmosphere, refer to. ==Derivation==