Lawyers for Forests (LFF) published a review of the act in 2002, and found a lack of resources to enforce the act, a lack of government transparency and accountability, that the act may be and is ignored in government decisionmaking, and that the act is generally unenforceable. The review identified the following factors: • Lack of political will for the implementation of the FFG Act. • Lack of funding and resources to allow the Department of Natural Resources and Environment (NRE) to effectively implement the Act. • Objectives of the FFG Act being overridden by objectives and interests of bodies with conflicting agendas, such as the forestry industry. As well as a general review, the review considers the impact of the Act on the
Leadbeater's possum, the
powerful owl and the
tiger quoll, as well as on a threatened community and a threatening process. For example, it considers the concern of environmentalists for the small and poorly placed Special Protection and Management Zones for the tiger quoll, the continuing clear-fell logging followed by slash burns in their management zones, and the failure to stop the use of
1080 poison, which is a threat to the species. LFF recommended that the NRE should receive appropriate funding to fully implement the FFG Act, and the government commit to NRE fulfilling its obligations under the Act. The group further recommended that the Act should be enforceable, and NRE should be accountable in its efforts to fulfil its obligations under the Act. Other environmental groups have echoed the review; for example, the "delays or lack of implementation of key documents required under the FFG Act" was noted by the Victorian Rainforest Network in 2003. ==2019 review and amendment==