2.
Earth 3.
Jupiter 4.
Sirius 5.
Aldebaran 6.
Betelgeuse <
Mu Cephei <
VV Cephei A < VY Canis Majoris. A very large and luminous star, VY Canis Majoris has been known to be an extreme object since the middle of the 20th century (among the
most extreme stars in the
Milky Way), although its true nature was uncertain. In the late 20th century, it was accepted that the star was a post-main-sequence red supergiant, occupying the upper-right-hand corner of the
Hertzsprung–Russell diagram (HR diagram) despite the uncertainty of its exact luminosity and temperature. Its angular diameter was measured and found to be significantly different depending on the observed wavelength. Most of the properties of the star depend directly on its distance, but the first meaningful estimates of its properties showed a very large star.
Luminosity The
bolometric luminosity (
L) of VY CMa can be calculated from
spectral energy distribution or bolometric flux, which can be determined from
photometry in several
visible and
infrared bands. Earlier calculations of the luminosity based on an assumed distance of gave luminosities between 200,000 and 560,000 times the
Sun's luminosity (), considerably very close or beyond the empirical
Humphreys–Davidson limit. One study gave nearly at a distance of . In 2006 a luminosity of was calculated by integrating the total fluxes over the entire nebula since most of the radiation coming from the star is reprocessed by the dust in the surrounding cloud. Modern estimates of the luminosity extrapolate values below based on distances below 1.2 kpc, with a 2011 value calculated to be based on a 2001 photometry. More recently, a lower luminosity of was derived in 2020 based on more recent photometry at more wavelengths to estimate the bolometric flux. Many older luminosity estimates are consistent with current ones if they are rescaled to the distance of 1.2 kpc. Despite being one of the most luminous stars in the Milky Way, much of the visible light of VY CMa is absorbed by the circumstellar envelope, so the star needs a telescope to be observed. Removing its envelope, the star would be one for the naked eye. Most of the output of VY CMa is emitted as infrared radiation, with a maximum emission at , which is in part caused by reprocessing of the radiation by the circumstellar nebula.
Mass Since this star has no companion star, its mass cannot be measured directly through gravitational interactions. Comparison of the effective temperature and bolometric luminosity compared to evolutionary tracks for massive stars suggests: • if a rotating star, an initial mass of but current mass and an age of 8.2 million years (Myr); or • if non-rotating, initially, falling to present-day . Older studies have found much higher initial masses (thus also higher current masses), such as a progenitor mass of based on old luminosity estimates.
Mass loss 's
Very Large Telescope showing the asymmetric nebula around VY CMa using
SPHERE instrument. The star itself is hidden behind a dark disk. Crosses are artifacts (lens effects) due to the characteristics of the instrument. VY CMa has a strong
stellar wind and is losing much material due to its high luminosity and quite low surface gravity. It has an average
mass loss rate of per year, among the highest known and unusually high even for a red supergiant, as evidenced by its extensive envelope. It is thus an exponent for the understanding of high-mass loss episodes near the end of massive star evolution. The mass loss rate probably exceeded /yr during the greatest mass loss events. The star has produced large, probably convection-driven, mass-loss events 70, 120, 200, and 250 years ago. The clump shed by the star between 1985 and 1995 is the source of its hydroxyl maser emission.
Temperature The effective temperature of this star is uncertain, although its temperature is well below . Some signature changes in its spectrum correspond to temperature variations. Early estimates of the mean temperature assumed values below (
K) based on a spectral class of M5. In 2006, its temperature was calculated to be as high as , corresponding to a spectral class of M2.5, yet this star is usually considered as an M4 to M5 star. Adopting the latter classes with the temperature scale proposed by
Emily Levesque gives a range of between 3,450 and 3,535 K.
Size ,
Rho Cassiopeiae, the
Pistol Star, and the Sun (too small to be visible in this thumbnail). The orbits of Jupiter and Neptune are also shown. The calculation of the radius of VY CMa is complicated by the extensive circumstellar envelope of the star. VY CMa is also a pulsating star, so its size changes with time. Early direct measurements of the radius at infrared (
K-band = ) wavelength gave an angular diameter of , corresponding to radii above at a still very plausible distance of 1.5 kpc; a radius considerably dwarfing other known red supergiants or hypergiants. However, this is probably larger than the actual size of the underlying star; this angular diameter estimate is heightened from interference by the envelope. In contrast to prevailing opinion, a 2006 study, ignoring the effects of the circumstellar envelope in the observed flux of the star, derived a luminosity of , suggesting an initial mass of and radius of based on an assumed effective temperature of 3,650 K and the same distance. On this basis, they considered both VY CMa and NML Cyg as normal early-type red supergiants. They assert that earlier very high luminosities of and very large radii of (up to ) were based on effective temperatures below 3,000 K that were unreasonably low. In 2006–07, almost immediately, another paper published a size estimate of and concluded that VY CMa is a true hypergiant. This uses the latter well-reviewed effective temperature , and a preferred luminosity of based on SED integration and still the same distance. In 2011, the star was studied at near-infrared wavelengths using
interferometry at the
Very Large Telescope. The published size of the star was based on its
Rosseland radius, a distance where the
optical depth is , the same condition used to measure the solar radius. The team derived an
angular diameter of which, at an averaged distance of , resulted in a radius of . The high spectral resolution of these observations allowed the effects of contamination by circumstellar layers to be minimised. An effective temperature of , corresponding to a spectral class of M4, was then derived from the radius and a measured flux of . Although well determined, the authors stated a possibility of the angular diameter, hence the photospheric radius, being slightly overestimated (on the order of 1 sigma). If overestimated, it would also imply a higher temperature. A 2013 estimate based on the Wittkowski radius and the Monnier radius put mean size at , and later that year, Matsuura and others put forward a competing method of finding radius within the envelope, putting the star at , based on a cool-end of estimates adopted temperature of 2,800 K and a luminosity of . However, these values are not consistent with its spectral types, leaving the 2012 values in better match. Most such radius estimates are considered as the size for the mean limit of the optical
photosphere while the size of the star for the radio photosphere is calculated to be twice that.
Largest star With the size of VY CMa calculated more accurately to be somewhat lower in 2012 and later, for example , this leaves larger sizes once published and in-date for other galactic and extragalactic red supergiants (and hypergiants) such as
WOH G64 A and
Stephenson 2 DFK 1. Despite this, VY Canis Majoris is still often described as the
largest known star, sometimes with caveats to account for the highly uncertain sizes of all these stars. ==Surroundings==