Early life and education Cash, known as "Jack" throughout his life, was born Joseph Wilbur Cash — he later reversed the order of his given names, and normally used only the initials — and grew up mostly in the mill village of
Gaffney, South Carolina. His parents were Nanette Lutitia Hamrick, the organist at the local Baptist church who had previously taught music in the public school, and John William Cash, who managed the
company store at the Limestone Mills. His ancestry was German and
Scotch-Irish. He had three brothers and a sister, all younger. He was educated at the local public school up to age 12, until his family moved 14 miles away to his mother's home town,
Boiling Springs, North Carolina. There, his father became a partner with Cash's maternal grandfather in a general store. For school, Cash attended Boiling Springs High School, a Baptist academy, where his high school classmates called him "Sleepy", due to his tendency to daydream. When he graduated from high school in April 1917, he gave the commencement address. Cash worked at his grandfather's farm in the summers. Although Cash's mother was a pious Baptist, and he adored her, Cash himself eventually turned away from religion. His relationship with his father was distant and somewhat fraught, as the rigidly conventional man considered his son to be a deviant for not following the religious and social customs of the time. Once when Cash was beaten up in a schoolyard fight, his father sent him back in order to teach him to behave like a man. John William Cash would later say that he did not recognize until much later how bright his son was, although his wife did. "I never did teach [him] that he was smart," he said, "I never did want him to think that he was smarter than most other people." In 1917 and 1918, Cash did odd jobs at shipyards and military camps from Maryland to Florida. He spent most time in
Spartanburg, South Carolina at
Camp Wadsworth; his father organized a fleet of cars there to help transport soldiers. Cash affected the style of a
bohemian and became known as the campus
iconoclast. During Cash's final two undergraduate years, he served first as Managing Editor and then Associate Editor of the college newspaper, the
Old Gold & Black, where he emulated
H. L. Mencken's style of writing. In his editorials, he opposed the state's Baptist newspaper
The Biblical Recorder on issues such as evolution and social dancing. In the summer, he worked at the hosiery mill at which his father was then the superintendent. Cash graduated in 1922 with an
A.B., and then attended
law school there for a year, before deciding not to pursue a legal career. For two years, Cash taught English at
Georgetown College in
Georgetown, Kentucky, and at a high school in North Carolina, before experiencing a nervous collapse. Throughout his life, Cash suffered from
manic depression or
affective disorder, which manifested itself in breakdowns, periods of depression, fear of sexual impotency, and physical ailments such as not being able to swallow or choking when he spoke. He also suffered from a
hyperthyroid condition, occasional
alcoholism, and excessive smoking. Cash usually referred to his condition as "
neurasthenia". After his breakdown, at great strain on their finances, Cash's parents paid for him to take a bicycle tour of Western Europe, during which he recovered. He contributed to
H. L. Mencken's
The American Mercury magazine, and received encouragement from Mencken. From 1929 to 1935, Cash wrote eight articles about various aspects of the South, including one in October 1929 called "The Mind of the South", which would become the basis for the later book. During the period of primary writing on
The Mind of the South (1929 to 1937), Cash continued to live with his parents in Boiling Springs. When his contributions to
The American Mercury ended after
Lawrence Spivak took over ownership of the magazine, Cash supported himself with freelance weekly book reviews to
The Charlotte News from 1935 to 1939, for each of which he received a payment of $3, equivalent to about $60-$65 in 2023. The "book reviews" often became fierce analytical diatribes penetrating the mindset of
Nazism under
Hitler and
Fascism under
Mussolini. Cash also wrote occasional editorials for the paper focusing primarily on the danger of Hitler and Mussolini to worldwide democracy, a topic on which he regularly expounded from 1935 and by the late 1930s would overtake his interest in the South and further delay completion of the book. Despite his focus on the European situation, he also continued to explore local subjects such as health conditions in the Black communities of Charlotte, the violence and depravity of lynchings, and the poor quality of policing in the area, much to the dismay of city boosters, who protested the negative publicity. He also reviewed favorably the writing which was emanating from the
Harlem Renaissance in New York, as well as the new generation of Southern writers such as
Thomas Wolfe,
Erskine Caldwell, and
William Faulkner, as well as
James Branch Cabell,
Lillian Smith,
Ellen Glasgow, and
Claude McKay. In October 1937, the strength of the freelance book reviews earned Cash a job as Associate Editor of the newspaper, which he held until May 1941, and which enabled him to move out of his parents' house. as Cash had yet to develop his own distinctive voice, but on the basis of the article, and Mencken's enthusiasm for Cash,
Blanche Knopf, the wife and partner of the magazine's publisher,
Alfred A. Knopf of New York, invited Cash to submit a plan or manuscript for a book-length expansion of the article. In April 1930, with the help of
University of North Carolina sociologist
Howard W. Odum, Cash submitted a sketch of the proposed book, on the basis of which the Knopfs offered Cash a contract. Over the next 10 years, as Cash worked on the book, the Knopfs – who were known for their sharp instincts about up-and-coming writers – provided both encouragement and small monetary advances to keep him going. Finally, on July 27, 1940, the last pages of the manuscript were finished and sent to New York. Five months later, on Christmas Eve, Cash and Northrup were married by a justice of the peace in
York, South Carolina.
Time said of
The Mind of the South "Anything written about the South henceforth must start where [Cash] leaves off."
Analysis Cash's work has been the subject of continuing debate among scholars since publication and the subject of numerous treatises in academic journals. The book has never been out of print: the first paperback edition was published in 1954, and a new edition was published in 1991 under the
Vintage Books imprint of
Random House. The book has enjoyed a wide and diverse readership through time and has often been assigned reading in course work in colleges and universities, both in and outside the South. The book had its greatest following during the 1950s and 1960s, at the height of the
Civil Rights Movement. It has been praised by many scholars as the virtual bible on the origins of Southern culture and required reading for any serious student on the social history of the South and its conflicts through time. According to the biographer Bruce Clayton, the central themes in
The Mind of the South were romanticism, violence, hyperbolic rhetoric, individualism, and white racial solidarity. Class consciousness was of minor importance. Historian
George B. Tindall wrote of the book: Two major themes dominate the book: the uniformity of the southern mind and its continuity. Class conflict in Cash's view, was limited by the "proto-Dorian bond" by which the common white (like the Doric knight of Sparta) was elevated to the dominant class through the "vastly ego-warming and ego-expanding distinction between the white man and the black." While there were in truth many Souths, the "man at the center" was the back country yeoman farmer of the Old South and his descendants, the people from whom Cash himself sprang. The book challenged both the shopworn cavalier myth of the Old South and the legend of a progressive and modernized South. The region was like "a tree with many age rings, with its limbs and trunk bent and twisted by all the winds of the years, but with its tap root still in the Old South."Cash explored many tenacious paradoxes – the juxtaposition of class unity and class exploitation, individualism and the "savage ideal" of conformity, fundamentalist morality and the "hell-of-a-fellow complex" – and the complicated interrelationship of these with race, romanticism, rhetoric, leisure, the cult of womanhood (the "lily-pure maid of Astolat"), the rape complex, violence, paternalism, demagoguery, and suspicion of outsiders. Historian
C. Vann Woodward, while praising Cash's vigorous style, rejected Cash's consensus thesis of unity and continuity. Woodward contends that Cash routinely ignored contrary evidence, underrated the
Founding Fathers and the
Jeffersonians, missed the power of the southern aristocracy, downplayed Blacks, minimized the central importance of slavery, failed to appreciate the
Populist movement, and overemphasized the plain white farmers and the Piedmont region, as opposed to the more influential plantation owners in the Black Belt. Perhaps most significantly, Cash's essential Southerness manifests itself in his admiration for many of the core aspects of the region, and leads him to blame much of the South's problems on Northern hatred and "Yankee intervention", a weakness that is seen throughout the book, but is perhaps most significant in Cash's failure to see through the myth that the
Reconstruction era was one of Black Republican and
carpetbagger misdeeds. This myth, the standard Southern view of the era, has since been thoroughly destroyed by post-World War II scholarship, but there was sufficient evidence debunking it at the time Cash was writing the book if he had chosen to research the subject more completely, and was not blinded by his own prejudices. Historian
Bertram Wyatt-Brown, in his introduction to the 1991 50th anniversary edition of the book, confirms some of Cash's oversights: [H]e knew nothing of the Charleston, New Orleans and Mobile antebellum planter-merchant classes and little about the sugar and cotton barons who established vast landed estates and built elaborate mansions along the lower Mississippi River. The Blue Grass of Kentucky and the Nashville Basin and the wire grass of Alabama were equally beyond his ken. He describes
The Mind of the South as "more than a social thesis that uses a slightly eccentric methodology. It is a great and brilliantly crafted work in the tradition of the literature of moral advocacy... [which] is Southern in every line." He quotes literary historian
Richard H. King as writing that Cash "fuses the Southern capacity for rhetorical extravagance with the less typical capacity for satire and irony. The result is a masterpiece of discursive prose, stylistically one of the most sophisticated works in American historiography." In his book
The South and the Sectional Conflict (1968), historian
David M. Potter calls Cash's book a "brilliant synthesis what was especially effective in showing how frontier strains of romanticism merged with upper class chivalric strains in forming a Southern romantic image of life." The penultimate paragraph from
The Mind of the South is often cited as a distillation of the entire book: Proud, brave, honorable by its lights, courteous, personally generous, loyal, swift to act, often too swift, but signally effective, sometimes terrible, in its action -- such was the South at its best. And such at its best it remains today, despite the great falling away in some of its virtues. Violence, intolerance, aversion and suspicion toward new ideas, an incapacity for analysis, an inclination to act from feeling rather than from thought, an exaggerated individualism and too narrow concept of social responsibility, attachment to fictions and false values, above all too great attachment to racial values and a tendency to justify cruelty and injustice in the name of those values, sentimentality and a lack of realism – these have been its characteristic vices in the past. And, despite changes for the better, they remain its characteristic vices today.
In Mexico In March 1941, largely on the strength of the critical success of the book, Cash was awarded a
Guggenheim Fellowship, which included a small stipend which would allow him to spend a year writing a novel about the progress of three generations of a Southern cotton mill family, like his own, from the
Old South into the modern era. Cash had always considered himself to be superior at writing fiction to non-fiction, as he stated in his October, 1940 application to the Guggenheim Foundation, and so he embraced with great eagerness the opportunity to try his hand at a novel for a year. Cash had made, first in 1932, then in 1936, two previous applications for Guggenheim grants: the first to have been a study of
Lafcadio Hearn, to have been titled "Anatomy of a Romantic," using Hearn as an exemplar by which to study Southern romantics generally, and the second to have been a study of the Nazi mindset by spending a year in Germany, a contrasting reprise of Cash's bicycle tour of pre-Nazi Europe during the summer of 1927. Likely because of Cash's lack of a published major work at the time, both applications were rejected. The third and successful application was sponsored by the Knopfs and by
Raleigh News & Observer editor and Guggenheim recipient,
Jonathan W. Daniels, who had befriended Cash in 1938. The Fellowship carried with it great prestige, Cash being placed in the select company of Daniels,
Thomas Wolfe, and playwright
Paul Green, as the only North Carolinians to have received the grant by 1941. Cash and his wife chose Mexico to spend their year on the Fellowship because it was cheap to live there, and they would have to watch every penny; they embarked on their trip to Mexico City on May 30, 1941. An autopsy failed to find evidence of a brain tumor. Cash's remains were cremated, and a funeral service was held in the First Baptist Church in Shelby. The ashes were later envaulted in Sunset Cemetery in Shelby. ==Legacy==