We the People Foundation and Robert L. Schulz have been the subject of federal investigations, and they have been directly and indirectly involved in various court cases regarding federal income taxation.
Tax protester arguments promoted by the Foundation In a case involving
Richard Michael Simkanin, a tax protester who supported the Foundation and who died while serving a prison sentence for Federal tax offenses, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has stated that the We the People Foundation ("WTP"): ::promotes the view that, despite common misconceptions,
there is actually no law that requires most Americans to pay income taxes or most companies to withhold taxes from employees' paychecks. WTP also espouses the view that
the Sixteenth Amendment was fraudulently declared to have been ratified.
IRS investigation In one case, Robert L. Schulz filed motions in a federal court to quash administrative summonses issued by the
Internal Revenue Service (IRS) seeking testimony and documents in connection with an IRS investigation. The
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed the dismissal of the taxpayer's motions for a lack of
subject matter jurisdiction because there was no actual
case or controversy as required by
Article III of the Constitution. The court reasoned that the summonses posed no threat of injury to the taxpayer, as the IRS had not yet initiated enforcement proceedings against him. The taxpayer was not entitled to a court order to quash the summonses until the IRS went to court to demand that he comply with the summons or otherwise face sanctions—something the IRS had not yet done. A subsequent attempt by Schulz to obtain a court order quashing an IRS "third party" summons issued to the internet payment service known as
PayPal was rejected by a Federal court in Nebraska in June 2006. The summons was issued to PayPal to obtain information about donations to (or purchases made at) an internet web site maintained by Schulz or We the People Foundation. The court record indicates that the IRS issued the summons to PayPal as part of an investigation of an alleged failure by Schulz to file Federal income tax returns for the years 2001 through 2004, after Schulz refused to cooperate with the IRS inquiry. Schulz lost this case on appeal on September 13, 2007. In this case, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit ruled: "Schulz's constitutional arguments challenging the IRS's authority to enforce the tax laws are without merit." On April 27, 2007, an appeal by Schulz in a similar case (from a Federal district court in California) to try to block an IRS summons was rejected by the
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Lawsuit over right to petition in connection with federal taxes In a separate case, Schulz and his We the People Foundation organization argued unsuccessfully that, based on the First Amendment right of the people to petition the government for a redress of grievances, the government should have a duty to respond to a taxpayer's demand for an explanation as to why taxpayers are subject to income tax. On May 8, 2007, the argument was rejected by the
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in
We the People Foundation, Inc. v. United States. The Foundation appealed to the
United States Supreme Court and, on January 7, 2008, the Supreme Court
declined to accept the case.
Permanent injunction halting certain Foundation activities On April 3, 2007, the U.S. Department of Justice announced that it had sued Schulz and two organizations, We the People Foundation for Constitutional Education Inc., and We the People Congress Inc., in connection with an attempt to stop the sale of an alleged tax fraud scheme reported to have cost the
U.S. Treasury more than 21 million dollars. The suit alleged that Schulz had "used the two We the People entities to market a nationwide tax fraud scheme, called the Tax Termination Package, to employers and employees." The government charged that "the Tax Termination Package includes We the People forms, which the defendants falsely tell customers can be used to replace forms the IRS requires employers and employees must use in connection with federal tax withholding from wages." On August 9, 2007, the
United States District Court for the Northern District of New York ruled that some the Foundation's activities constituted the promotion of an illegal
tax shelter by means of a statement or statements that the promoter "knows or has reason to known is false or fraudulent as to any material matter" under
Internal Revenue Code section 6700 (), and that a court order prohibiting those activities under was appropriate. The court issued an order including an
injunction permanently barring Schulz and his We the People Foundation from (1) advising or instructing persons or entities that they are not required to file federal tax returns or pay federal taxes (see
Tax protester arguments); (2) selling or furnishing any materials purporting to enable individuals to discontinue or stop withholding or paying federal taxes; (3) instructing, advising or assisting anyone to stop withholding or stop paying federal employment or income taxes; and (4) obstructing or advising anyone to obstruct IRS examinations, collections, or other IRS proceedings. On or about August 29, 2007, much of the material on the We the People web sites was removed pursuant to the court order, a copy of which was posted on the web sites. The court "also ordered that the names, addresses, telephone numbers, e-mail addresses and
Social Security numbers of every person who received materials on how to stop paying taxes be turned over to the government." According to the
New York Times, "[t]his information would make it easy for the Internal Revenue Service to identify people who followed the illegal advice and for the
Justice Department to prosecute them for tax crimes." The Court of Appeals stated: ::Defendants principally argue that the tax materials at issue constitute protected political and/or educational speech under the First Amendment of the Constitution. Defendants further argue that their actions in promoting the materials are otherwise protected under the First Amendment's Petition Clause, on the theory that the government has yet to respond to defendants' repeated inquiries as to whether, and on what basis, any information in the tax materials is false. [ . . . ] We have considered all of defendants' arguments and find them to be without merit. The Court of Appeals also reinstated the District Court's requirement that the Foundation must provide the government "the names and contact information of the individuals who have received the tax materials."
Contempt proceeding On April 7, 2008, the government filed a motion in the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York, asking the court to hold Robert L. Schulz and the We the People Foundation in civil
contempt of court for failure to comply with the court order requiring Schulz to turn over, to the government, the names and contact information of the individuals who have received tax materials from the Foundation. On April 28, 2008, the District Court issued an order holding We the People Foundation and the other defendants in contempt of court, imposing fines of $2,000 per day on Robert Schulz, the We the People Foundation, and We the People Congress, effective retroactively to April 28, 2008, if the defendants did not comply with the court order by 4:00 p.m. on Monday, May 5, 2008. At 3:55 pm on May 5, 2008, Schulz filed a document with the court asserting that he had turned the material over to the United States attorney's office earlier that day. ==Disputing President Obama's citizenship==