After criticism about allegedly incorrect attribution such as pictures of Soviet atrocities wrongly attributed to Germans and captioning of some of the images in the exhibition, the exhibition was heavily criticized by some historians such as Polish-born historian
Bogdan Musiał and
Hungarian historian
Krisztián Ungváry. Ungváry claimed that only ten percent of the 800 photos of war crimes were in fact German
Wehrmacht crimes and the rest were
Soviet war crimes or crimes committed by Hungarian, Finnish, Croatian, Ukrainian or Baltic forces, or by members of the SS or SD, none of whom were members of the
Wehrmacht, or not crimes at all. The head and founder of the Hamburg Institute for Social Research,
Jan Philipp Reemtsma suspended the display, pending review of its content by a committee of historians. The review stated that contrary to Ungváry, only 20 out of 1400 pictures were found to be of
Soviet atrocities. The committee’s report acknowledged that the exhibit’s documentation contained inaccuracies and that its arguments may have been too sweeping. It concluded, however, that the Wehrmacht had indeed led a war of annihilation and committed atrocities. The accusation of forged materials was found to be unjustified. In a written statement, Reemtsma said: In its report from November 2000, the committee reaffirmed the reliability of the exhibition in general, explaining that the errors had already been corrected. The committee recommended that the exhibition be expanded to include perspectives of the victims as well, presenting the material but leaving the conclusions to the viewers. Notably, the exhibition does not inform about the
Wehrmachts crimes in
occupied Poland on either side of the
Curzon Line. They were presented later as an entirely different exposition called
Größte Härte: Verbrechen der Wehrmacht in Polen September/Oktober 1939 (Crimes of the
Wehrmacht in Poland, September/October 1939) by the Deutsches Historisches Institut Warschau. ==Revised exhibition, 2001–2004==