Contemporary reviews for
Westfront 1918 were generally positive, according to film scholar Jan-Christopher Horak in a video interview accompanying the Criterion Collection release package.
Alfred Kerr writing in the
Berliner Tageblatt in 1930 said of it: "Apart from anything I saw in the winter, a sound film stirred me most: because it exposes the face of war for non-participants in the most shocking way. The numbing impression lasted for weeks and months. One should perform this piece every New Year's Day in every village, in every school by law. What are theatre plays?" In the
Frankfurter Zeitung in the same year,
Siegfried Kracauer wrote: "From the truthful reproduction of horror that prevails here, two scenes that almost exceed the limit of expression stand out. One: a single battle ends with an infantryman being drowned in the swamp in front of everyone. (The fact that you can still see his hand protrude from the bubbling mud later is unnecessary
sensationalism.) The other is the front military hospital in the church with the maimed, nurses and doctors who can barely operate from exhaustion. It is as if medieval torture pictures come to life". More recent reviews of the film, though generally positive, are more subdued. The review aggregator
Rotten Tomatoes records 9/9 positive professional reviews, with the average score 7.9/10. Walter Goodman, in his review in
The New York Times on 22 November 1987, compares the film unfavourably to
Lewis Milestone's
All Quiet in the Westfront, stating: "Although the German work ... isn't nearly as moving as "All Quiet", it has a power of its own... Pabst is especially good at giving a gritty documentary quality to the battle scenes; the pointless slaughter comes through. The movie is weaker when it focuses on individual soldiers. ... The truth of the movie is all in the trenches."
J. Hoberman reviewed the film positively in
The Village Voice on 10 May 2005, writing "The always protean Pabst made a brilliant adjustment to sound." == Home video ==