The scaling hypothesis is that near the critical point, the free energy f(t,H), in d dimensions, can be written as the sum of a slowly varying regular part f_r and a singular part f_s, with the singular part being a scaling function, i.e., a
homogeneous function, so that : f_s(\lambda^p t, \lambda^q H) = \lambda^d f_s(t, H) \, Then taking the
partial derivative with respect to
H and the form of
M(t,H) gives : \lambda^q M(\lambda^p t, \lambda^q H) = \lambda^d M(t, H) \, Setting H=0 and \lambda = (-t)^{-1/p} in the preceding equation yields : M(t,0) = (-t)^{\frac{d-q}{p}} M(-1,0), for t \uparrow 0 Comparing this with the definition of \beta yields its value, : \beta = \frac{d-q}{p}\equiv \frac{\nu}2(d-2+\eta). Similarly, putting t=0 and \lambda = H^{-1/q} into the scaling relation for
M yields : \delta = \frac{q}{d-q} \equiv \frac{d+2-\eta}{d-2+\eta}. Hence : \frac{q}{p} = \frac{\nu}{2} (d+2-\eta),~\frac 1 p=\nu. Applying the expression for the
isothermal susceptibility \chi_T in terms of
M to the scaling relation yields : \lambda^{2q} \chi_T (\lambda^p t, \lambda^q H) = \lambda^d \chi_T (t, H) \, Setting
H=0 and \lambda = (t)^{-1/p} for t \downarrow 0 (resp. \lambda = (-t)^{-1/p} for t \uparrow 0 ) yields : \gamma = \gamma' = \frac{2q -d}{p} \, Similarly for the expression for
specific heat c_H in terms of
M to the scaling relation yields : \lambda^{2p} c_H ( \lambda^p t, \lambda^q H) = \lambda^d c_H(t, H) \, Taking
H=0 and \lambda = (t)^{-1/p} for t \downarrow 0 (or \lambda = (-t)^{-1/p} for t \uparrow 0) yields : \alpha = \alpha' = 2 -\frac{d}{p}=2-\nu d As a consequence of Widom scaling, not all critical exponents are independent but they can be parameterized by two numbers p, q \in \mathbb{R} with the relations expressed as : \alpha = \alpha' = 2-\nu d, : \gamma = \gamma' = \beta(\delta -1)=\nu(2-\eta) . The relations are experimentally well verified for magnetic systems and fluids. ==References==