Immanuel Kant used the term "leap" in his 1784 essay,
Answering the Question: What is Enlightenment?, writing: "
Dogmas and formulas, these mechanical tools designed for reasonable use—or rather abuse—of his natural gifts, are the fetters of an everlasting
nonage. The man who casts them off would make an uncertain leap over the narrowest ditch, because he is not used to such free movement. That is why there are only a few men who walk firmly, and who have emerged from nonage by cultivating their own minds." Some theistic realms of thought do not agree with the implications that this phrase carries.
C. S. Lewis argues against the idea that Christianity requires a "leap of faith". One of Lewis' arguments is that
supernaturalism, a basic tenet of Christianity, can be logically inferred based on a
teleological argument regarding the source of human reason. Some Christians are less critical of the term and do accept that religion requires a "leap of faith".
Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi,
Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, and C. S. Lewis wrote about Christianity in accordance with their understanding. Kierkegaard was of the opinion that faith was unexplainable and inexplicable. The more a person tries to explain personal faith to another, the more entangled that person becomes in language and
semantics but "
recollection" is "
das Zugleich, the all-at-once," that always brings him back to himself. In the 1916 article "The Anti-Intellectualism of Kierkegaard",
David F. Swenson wrote: In Kierkegaard's meaning, purely theological assertions are
subjective truths and they cannot be either verified or invalidated by science, i.e. through objective knowledge. For him, choosing if one is for or against a certain subjective truth is a purely arbitrary choice. He calls the jump from objective knowledge to religious faith a leap of faith, since it means subjectively accepting statements which cannot be rationally justified. For him the Christian faith is the result of the trajectory initiated by such choices, which don't have and cannot have a rational ground (meaning that reason is neither for or against making such choices). Objectively regarded, purely theological assertions are neither true nor false. ==References==