The
Great Western Railway (GWR) had opened
its main line from London to
Bristol in 1841, and the
London and Southampton Railway had opened in 1840; and its successor the
London and South Western Railway (LSWR) was extending westwards. The advantage to communities connected to the new railways was immediately apparent; in contrast, places remote from these lines felt strongly the disadvantage at which they were placed. The areas of south-west Wiltshire were prosperous from sheep farming and wool manufacture, and quickly saw that they too needed a railway. The LSWR proposed a line from
Basingstoke to
Swindon, and at this time there was intense rivalry between them and the GWR to control territory: the railway that was first to have a line in an area would have an enormous competitive advantage there, and could often use that line as a base to extend further. The GWR was building its lines on the
broad gauge and the LSWR on what is now the
standard gauge (referred to at the time as "narrow gauge"), and they were anxious to ensure that any new independent railway should be on their own preferred track gauge; this rivalry is characterised as the "
gauge wars". The proposed LSWR line to Swindon, the heart of GWR territory, was met with furious opposition, and the GWR promoted two nominally independent lines, the
Berks and Hants Railway and the Wilts, Somerset and Weymouth Railway. At the first meeting of the nascent GWR company on 9 July 1844, Charles Alexander Saunders, secretary of the GWR, suggested that the necessary sum of £650,000 could be secured on a GWR guarantee; the GWR would be the lessee of the line, and would directly subscribe half of the capital.
Mission creep The
Bristol and Exeter Railway (B&ER), a broad gauge line friendly to the GWR, was proposing a line to
Weymouth from its own main line at
Durston, west of
Bridgwater, and the WS&WR promoters decided to add a branch to their own line from
Frome to
Yeovil to meet the B&ER line there, forming a large triangle and making (with the GWR line) a direct route from London to Weymouth. In September 1844 the Board of Trade assented to this addition; this added £350,000 to the capital required: it would now cost £1 million. A month later, at a meeting in Frome on 23 October 1844, the B&ER announced that it had decided to alter the route of its Weymouth branch, running from Durston much further south through
Bridport, with a branch to Yeovil. The Yeovil to Weymouth section would not be built, so the WS&WR added that to their own scheme: the capital cost was now to be £1.5 million. The cities of
Bath and
Bristol felt left out of these connections to the South Coast, and the
Taunton Courier recorded that a deputation of merchants and traders of Bristol had gone to the Great Western Board; they were not warmly received, and Hadfield adds in a footnote on the same page that "In fact the [west] curve at Thingley [near Chippenham] was specifically authorised (but not built) to give connection between Bath and
Trowbridge." At this period the
Board of Trade determined the relative merits of competing proposals, and the huge stakes meant that it was crucial to secure their approval; it was reported in the
London Gazette on 31 December 1844 that the Board of Trade were supportive of the WS&WR scheme, provided the GWR sought to construct a connecting line from Bath to join the WS&WR. The GWR immediately undertook to apply for an act of Parliament giving authority for such a line in the 1846 session. However the frenzy of projecting railways at this time was such that the
Kennet and Avon Canal proposed laying broad gauge tracks on each side of their canal; this would be the
London, Newbury and Bath Direct Railway. It may have been a startling scheme, but it passed its second reading in Parliament in the 1846 session, when the
Berks and Hants Railway Bill was thrown out. However the Kennet and Avon company was evidently bought off by the GWR, for they dropped their scheme; their minutes of 9 September 1846 record the first instalment of £5,000 having been received in payment. Having deliberated, the Board of Trade announced their decision: they found in favour of the WS&WR scheme, rejecting the LSWR's Swindon line.
The act obtained at last The Wilts, Somerset and Weymouth Railway obtained its authorising
act of Parliament, the '''''' (
8 & 9 Vict. c. liii), on 30 June 1845. It was to be on the same broad gauge as the GWR network, and to run from near
Chippenham to
Salisbury, with branches to
Weymouth, Dorset,
Sherborne,
Devizes and
Bradford-on-Avon, and a coal branch to
Radstock. In the same session, authorising acts were passed for the
Berks and Hants Railway (
Reading to
Hungerford and
Basingstoke, sponsored by the GWR) and the
Taunton to Yeovil branch of the B&ER. By now the
Southampton and Dorchester Railway, friendly to the LSWR, had reached Dorchester (on 1 June 1847). The line had been independently promoted, and it had wooed both the GWR and the LSWR at times, and its loss to the narrow gauge camp was a blow to the GWR. That company had always intended that the WS&WR should be part of a through main line to
Exeter, and was now considering how that might be created; as its construction would put the friendly B&ER at a disadvantage, the GWR proposed purchasing the B&ER, an offer that was rejected. The GWR now actively planned its line to the west: it would infill the Hungerford (Berks and Hants) to
Devizes (WS&WR) section, and build a new line from
Yeovil (WS&WR) to Exeter via
Axminster. This latter line was not built by the GWR, but its development as a scheme provoked renewed hostility from the LSWR camp, and also opposition from the otherwise friendly B&ER. ==First sections: Westbury==