The opposing groups were led by
Christopher Bagshaw with Thomas Bluet, and the Jesuit
William Weston. The immediate cause of the friction was the keeping of
fast days.
Peter Burke sees the faultline, traditionally described as "Jesuits and seculars" (for example in
Thomas Graves Law,
The Conflicts between Jesuits and Seculars in the reign of Queen Elizabeth, 1889) as between
Counter-Reformation Catholics and Catholics of a more traditional mould; he takes as example the strife over a
hobby horse brought out for Christmas celebrations. There were perhaps 33 Catholics then kept in the castle, who were almost all priests. A list given by Law (Appendix A) applies to 1595/6, and shows 32. A group of 18 were with the Jesuits Weston and
Thomas Pounde (a lay brother) in wishing a separate regular life (on some accounts Pounde was not at Wisbech for the main episodes of the Stirs, however).
Henry Garnet, who was Jesuit provincial in the country, consented to this in February 1595. But in practical terms there was hardly room for two groups living separately. Garnet's handling of the issue set off vehement protest from Bagshaw and his supporters. In his later book on the affair, Bagshaw blamed the Stirs on Weston, as emissary of Parsons. The underlying tension over Parsons and the vacuum caused for the English mission by the death of Cardinal Allen played a part, and were the reason for intrigue; but so did local factors, including Bagshaw's abuse of those wishing to have a more regulated communal life, with comparisons to
Puritans and
Calvinists. The conflict had wide ramifications: Bagshaw was in touch not only with Paget, who had backing from
William Gifford in France, but with another group with connections in Rome (Hugh Griffin and
Nicholas Fitzherbert).
John Bavant and Alban Dolman were called in first, but they were split as to what to do. Bavant was not a Jesuit, but participated in an administrative network set up by the Jesuits, for which he took responsibility in
East Anglia. Dolman was in the
Servants of Mary. In October 1595 two more arbitrators,
John Mush and Richard Dudley, intervened to mediate, with greater success; Mush was more sympathetic to the anti-Jesuit group led by Bagshaw. But the problem returned in 1596. == Further reading ==