Schneider et al. noted first the similarities of the spectrum with both L-dwarfs and T-dwarfs. The tentative classification as esdT0.0±1.0 was given due to the low estimated temperature. The discovery by Lodieu et al. that methane was not present in the near-infrared spectrum raised the question if a T-dwarf classification was possible. Methane is a key diagnostic feature for T-dwarfs. Jun-Yan Zhang et al. noted that WISEA 1810 cannot be classified as an L-dwarf either because of some key differences, such as: • A redder W1–W2 color. • Missing
hydrides (such as FeH), which become stronger in metal-poor L-dwarfs. • L-subdwarfs have little water absorptions, but WISEA 1810 has deep water absorptions
JWST observations of the methane band and other molecules in the mid-infrared of WISEA 1810 or other proposed esdT might resolve the question if these objects can be classified as T-dwarfs. If these objects cannot be classified as T-dwarfs, they might be given a new spectral type. Jun-Yan Zhang et al. proposed the letters H or Z (therefore H-dwarf or Z-dwarf). New esdT (or H/Z-dwarfs) might be discovered in the future with ESA's
Euclid and the
Rubin Observatory. A spectrum from the ground did however detect methane, showing that the classification of WISEA 1810-1010 is consistent with a T-dwarf. == See also ==