The fossil was discovered in a lake basin that undergoes several drying phases throughout the year. These phases cause displacements in the surrounding sediment and stratigraphy, thus making it difficult to properly date the fossil. There have been many attempts in trying to accurately date WLH-50 some of which include:
Radio carbon dating In 1981 and 1982 the
Australian National University radio carbon dating lab tested the
carbonate that encrusted the bone, as well as a freshwater shell and found: • Carbonate – 9050 ± 310 BP (calibrated to 9.5–11.1 thousand years old, 2-σ error) • Freshwater shell – 14,380 ± 240 BP (calibrated to 16.5–18.0 thousand years old)
Electromagnetic spin resonance In 1987, D.A. Caddie conducted ESR dating technique and calculated that the bone fragment was 29,000 ± 5,000 years old.
Spectrometry Simpson and Grun reported in 1998 that the fossil was potentially 14,000 years old, according to
gamma spectroscopy and
thermal ionization mass spectrometry (TIMS)/
Uranium-series dating. It has been suggested that the latter technique provides a minimum age for this fossil, due to the fact that uranium uptake begins following burial. == Replacement Theory vs. Multi-Regional Mode ==