One study found that the WCD's data was "highly correlated with other sources that offer cross-national religious composition estimates" but the database "consistently gives a higher estimate for percent Christian in comparison to other cross-national data sets". Concern has also been raised about possible bias because the
World Christian Encyclopedia was originally developed as a Christian missionary tool. Regarding another faith group, the Anlgican Communion, David Goodhew, a researcher and fellow of
St. John's College,
Durham University, argued that the encyclopedia and WCD "give the best data on the current size of the Communion." Peer-reviewed work in the academic journal,
Review of Religious Research, expressed mixed views, both saying the World Christian Encyclopedia's editors "provide reasonable methodological reflections" while also identifying the uncritical acceptance of religious group's membership claims as a weakness. Another review in the same journal, the
Review of Religious Research, described the World Christian Encyclopedia as basing its information on "a direct analysis of primary organizational data," but again noted that a weakness is in relying on how religious groups define their own membership. Rodney Stark, publishing in the journal,
Sociological Analysis, determined that the 1983 edition's "data are probably reasonably accurate..." ==References==