The initial analysis by Xu
et al. showed that
Xiaotingia formed a
clade with
Archaeopteryx,
Dromaeosauridae and
Troodontidae to the exclusion of other groups traditionally seen as birds. Xu
et al. therefore (re)defined the concepts of
Deinonychosauria and
Avialae to the extent that
Archaeopteryx and
Xiaotingia belonged to the Deinonychosauria in the clade
Archaeopterygidae. although Xu
et al. noted that there are several competing definitions of the clade Aves currently in use, pointing out that their definitions are compatible with a traditional
Aves with
Archaeopteryx as a specifier. In 2012, an expanded and revised version of the initial analysis also found
Archaeopteryx to be avialan and
Anchiornis to be troodontid, but recovered
Xiaotingia as the most primitive member of the clade
Dromaeosauridae rather than a close relative of
Anchiornis within Troodontidae. Cladogram following the results of a phylogenetic study by Lefèvre
et al., 2017. }} }} In the 2017 re-evaluation of the Harlem
Archaeopteryx specimen,
Xiaotingia was found to be an
anchiornithid, with this group being avialan. Foth et al. (2025) recovered
Xiaotingia as a sister taxon of
Avialae, but outside anchiornithids. ==References==