When the Spanish
conquistadors arrived in modern-day Peru, the
yanakuna assisted the Spaniards to take control of the empire. These people had their names used by the Spaniards, during the
Spanish conquest of the Inca Empire, as one for the indigenous people they had in servitude, in encomiendas, or in military forces as
indios auxiliares (
Indian auxiliaries). After the conquest, as craftworkers and laborers, the
yanakuna played a significant role in a variety of both rural and urban production sectors in Peru's colonial economy.
First decades of colonization The Spanish initially exacted tribute from the indigenous peoples of Peru through the
ayllu-based
encomienda system, by which native subjects were forced to contribute labor and goods (increasingly in the form of silver money) in service of the Spanish crown.
Yanakuna, however, were separate from this system of obligation, and often performed different tasks. While the
indios de encomienda fulfilled the most menial jobs in the
Potosi silver mines, for example,
yanakuna served as skilled artisans. Some
yanakuna did work in the mines themselves from their beginnings in the 1540s, but unlike the
indios de encomienda, they worked as free wage laborers.
Yanakuna in mining and the mita Under the reforms imposed by Viceroy
Francisco de Toledo (1569-1581), a system of draft labor known as the
mita came to replace the encomienda system, by which villages within a several-hundred mile radius around Potosi had to send around one seventh of their male tribute-age population (from ages 18 to 50) each year to work in the mines. This change in labor organization occurred for a number of reasons: the Crown's explicitly stated preference for Peru to emphasize silver export and advances in mining technology increase the demand for labor; at the same time, the imposition of the
mita allowed the Crown to push against the power of the
encomenderos (Spanish recipients of
encomienda grants), and offer native labor to non-
encomenderos in Peru. With this shift,
yanakuna retained their place within the colonial economy of labor, and even grew in importance. As
indios de encomienda decreased in number at Potosi,
yanakuna increased. And, though
mitayos (
mita labor draftees) filled an important role in completing tasks undesirable to free laborers, they did not constitute a majority of laborers at Potosiin 1603, for example, only 5,100 Indians out of 58,800 working at Potosi were
mitayos. The proportion of
mitayos continued to decrease through the seventeenth century, as the proportion of
yanakuna increased: in the latter half of the sixteenth century,
yanakuna constituted less than 10% of tribute paying subjects, while they constituted about 40% of this population in the latter half of the seventeenth century. A 1601 order from the Crown stated a preference for voluntary labor; indeed, though the
yanakuna may have been bound as servants, historian
Raquel Gil Montero suggests that after the Toledo reforms, the tribute-paying
yanakuna at Potosi could be considered "free laborers." It was to the natives' advantage to work for market-rate wages as a free laborer (as opposed to the below market-rate wages of the
mitayos), considering the expectation of tribute in money form.
Yanakuna in other economic sectors and labor arrangements As Spanish settlers brought European agriculture to Peru,
yanakuna labor supplemented that of
mita draftees on farms. In this context, "
yanakuna" referred to laborers who permanently resided at their place of employment. As an alternative to
mita draftees, Spaniards preferred
yanakuna were to African slaves, as the former were familiar with both indigenous and European methods, and did not need to be purchased. As in the mines,
yanakuna labor in some areas represented a significant proportion of the labor force. The historian Steve J. Stern has written that Spanish colonials in the Huamanga region of Peru increasingly depended on contracted
yanakuna labor as the
mita labor draft became less reliable, especially for less politically influential settlers (in part due to resistance and evasion from within
ayllus, as well as indigenous population decline). This was the case not only in farming and mining, but also in ranching and manufactures. In these contract relationships, a
yanakuna promised labor services to a master in exchange for subsistence, as well as land and credit. Labor arrangements mimicking this
yanakuna formseparate from the natives'
ayllus proliferated through the early seventeenth century, as Spanish employers sought to secure a labor force. In some cases, factory owners brought laborers from their
ayllus to reside
in situ like
yanakuna; in others, contracts with free wage laborers came to resemble
yanakuna contracts in their duration and reciprocal guarantees. What Stern calls "yanacona-like" relationships developed as a way for Indian workers to repay debts to a Spanish employer. And, due to labor demand, Spaniard's sometimes sought to convince Indians to voluntarily enter
yanakuna contracts on farms with attractive wage offers. The need for coercion to secure labor indeed decreased, as the monetization of tribute, the associated integration of a commercial economy, and the burdens of the
mita made
ayllus less self-sufficient, and induced Indian members to seek subsistence beyond. Though separate from their
ayllus,
yanakuna were not completely dislocated from community. Many still owned land, and some of those working on farms lived their with families. In general, like other colonial-era migrants,
yanakuna moved with their families and spouses. In urban areas,
yanakuna owned and passed down real estate. Unlike many other urban Indian laborers bound in servitude, often in domestic work, urban
yanakuna maintained a more privileged status working as skilled craftspeople. Here, they were also distinguished by their comparably greater degree of acculturation to Spanish custom and language. Some scholars argue that this integration into urban colonial society by
yanakuna actually represented an extension into a new context of older Andean practices of migration meant to fulfill different ecological niches. The term
yanakuna also was used during the
conquest of Chile and other areas of
South America, like the
New Kingdom of Granada. ==Modern use==