The identity of the figure named Yazīd in the inscription is open to interpretation, especially in light of the undated nature of the inscription. First, the term
mlk (
malik) in inscriptions from this period does not necessarily denote a king who ruled over a specified territory. For example, the
Jebel Usays inscription applies the title to
al-Harith ibn Jabalah, ruler of the
Ghassanids, possibly in reference to the title he had been given of
phylarch by the
Byzantine emperor
Justinian I. If the figure mentioned in the inscription corresponds to one from known sources, it may refer to Yazīd son of al-ʾAswad (the only figure from classical Arabic sources by the name of Yazīd associated with the Ghassanids), Yazīd son of Qays the
Ḥujrid (mentioned by
Photios I of Constantinople mentioned in his
Bibliotheca), or Yazīd son of Kabaśat (mentioned in the late
Sabaic inscription
CIH 541 as a figure appointed by the
South Arabian ruler
Abraha). From the Islamic period, it may refer to the
Umayyad ruler
Yazid I, a view that is increasingly held, and ties in with the likely presence of Arab Christians in early Islamic armies. == Linguistics ==