The laws of the
zav are first discussed in the
Mishnah, tractate
Zavim. A topic summary appears in
Sefer Hachinuch, Mitzvah 178.
Discussion of the physical situation The male
zavs discharge is different from that of the female
zavah: the
zavah emits blood, while the
zav emits a whitish fluid, which has a slight reddish tinge. According to
Maimonides, the
zav state is a disease of the male reproductive system while the man's general health remains normal, causing semen to ooze out without stimulation, erection, or pleasure; and to be discolored and have a thin consistency. Maimonides understands the same word as meaning even a minute amount of discharge that passes the exiting boundary of the male urinary tract.
Laws If a man observes the abnormal discharge once, he becomes impure for a single day, like one who ejaculated normal semen. If he observes the discharge twice, the full seven-day period of impurity is required. If he observes it three times, he must also bring the specified sacrifice. These observations can occur on the same day, or on consecutive days. Only after the week's wait and immersion would he become ritually pure once more (), but he would not be permitted to eat
terumah nor to eat the flesh of a sacrifice until after bringing his sacrifice until nightfall of the eighth day. The
zav is quantified as an
Av HaTumah, something able to transfer uncleanliness. In addition, his actual
zav discharge,
saliva, semen, and
urine are also deemed to have
Av HaTumah status. Regarding the transportability of
tumah from the
zav, the Mishnah records that if a ritually clean person and a
zav both sat on an animal, or in a small boat, then the ritually clean person would become ritually unclean by doing so, regardless of how far apart they might sit. This is known as
hesset ("minor movement"). Regular
ejaculation is treated as being distinct from
zav, and is known as
keri (קֶרִי) ().
Viewed as Divine punishment Ibn Ezra notes that the Torah requirement of bringing a
sin-offering upon the completion of seven clean days is an indication that the
zav committed a sinful act that incurred his
zav status. Similarly,
Hezekiah ben Manoah writes that the textual order of the
zav laws near those of
tzaraath and
embezzlement (me'ilah), and demonstrate that
zav status is incurred by lack of earnestness (to God) and sin.
Shabbatai HaKohen commented that
zav status is a divine consequence for excessive indulgence in physical relations in the laying position. Thus, as a consequence, items the
zav will lay upon (i.e. midras objects) will become
tamei (impure) for the duration of his
zav state. == In modern Judaism ==