Motivation The headline theme for the 2003 march was to oppose the anti-subversion
Hong Kong Basic Law Article 23. Fear of the loss of
freedom of speech along with other freedoms, as well as a general dissatisfaction against the Hong Kong Government prompted a mass protest of hundreds of thousands of people on 1 July 2003. The government attempted to pass Article 23 in Legislative Council, tabling the vote for 9 July 2003. The debate continued for months, with the
Government refusing to make any concessions. Other issues include a number of blunders by the
Tung Chee Hwa administration adding to people's frustrations, including the "Lexusgate" scandal involving the Financial Secretary
Antony Leung and the government's incompetent handling of the
SARS health crisis, all against the backdrop of the state of the economy.
Formation The planners originally wanted all four football courts in
Victoria Park, but all courts were booked for a pro-Beijing festival and fair. The organisers originally predicted only 20,000 demonstrators would participate. The actual number ranged from 350,000 (as quoted by the police) to 700,000 (as quoted by protesters) and even 1,000,000 (quoted from a pro-Falun Gong agency). The generally accepted figure is 500,000, a little less than one tenth the population at the time. Some Christian churches led by Rev.
Chu Yiu Ming (朱耀明) of the Baptist Church and Roman Catholics led by
Bishop Joseph Zen organised a prayer gathering in Victoria Park before the march which was attended by some 40,000 people. The
Civil Human Rights Front was also organised. Members of
Falun Gong also took part in the protest, but have been asked by the organisers to march at the end of the rally. The march was originally scheduled to start at 2:30 pm at the football pitch in Victoria Park, arriving at the government headquarter building. Their route stretched from Victoria Park football field through Causeway Bay and
Central to the Government's Central offices. Nonetheless, the large numbers meant that people were still starting the march as late as 10 pm.
Aftermath After half-million people protested against the law,
James Tien resigned from the
Executive Council to vote against proposals for legislation as required under Article 23 of the Hong Kong Basic Law. The Government then backed down on the proposal because it lacked the necessary votes to pass the legislation after losing the support of Tien's
Liberal Party. Afterwards,
Regina Ip and
Antony Leung resigned, stating "personal reasons". ==2004==