Emergency response The
New York City Fire Department initially
sounded a second alarm, then rapidly ratcheted the event up to a five-alarm response, This prevented residents from returning to their homes that evening, and kept thousands of workers from their offices the following day, Although an underground electrical transformer and feeder cables were also damaged, there were no significant power outages reported, but customers in the affected area were asked to reduce demand.
Cellular telephone service was overloaded in the immediate aftermath, and blocked calls were reported as many people in the area tried to make calls at the same time. Bus and
subway service were also affected. The
42nd Street Shuttle and
IRT Lexington Avenue Line and train service had to be suspended in Manhattan, and the train was rerouted via the
IRT Broadway – Seventh Avenue Line, but the subway infrastructure was not damaged. Subway service was restored overnight, before the next morning's rush hour, with all trains initially bypassing the
Grand Central – 42nd Street station.
Grand Central Terminal was also at least partially evacuated in the immediate aftermath, Con Edison has offered to reimburse businesses for direct costs of damage and clean-up, but not for business interruption costs, such as lost productivity and revenue. A woman was also injured in the immediate panic of the crowd evacuating the explosion area. She was trampled by the crowd and severely injured her ankle and knee requiring numerous surgeries. After dying from cancer, her son announced that her lawsuit with the city and Con Edison was settled. Her story was well documented by her son, a producer on the
Ron and Fez show on
Sirius XM Radio Political aftermath New York City Council member
Daniel Garodnick announced that City Hall hearings on the explosion were set for August 7. The city council also held hearings after the
2006 Queens blackout where Con Edison C.E.O.
Kevin Burke was subjected to a grueling round of questioning by local lawmakers. The New York City Council Speaker
Christine Quinn and other city lawmakers said they intended to ask tough questions of the utility at the hearings, and would be reevaluating Con Edison's monopoly status, indicating that they have lost confidence in the utility company. Longhi provided little additional information pending completion of the investigation, sparking a heated exchange with Quinn. On December 27, 2007, in response to the report by the utility, New York City Councilman
Eric Gioia criticized the company for identifying the city as potentially responsible for the blast in an October court filing laying the groundwork for a possible future lawsuit. That notice of claim said city sewers, pipes and drains could have leaked cold water onto the hot steam pipe. Gioa's statement said, "they'll do anything they can to deflect blame and avoid taking responsibility, but now this report shows that Con Ed's poor maintenance contributed to this deadly explosion." In
Boston, Massachusetts, which has a network of steam distribution pipes operated by Veolia Energy Boston, Mayor
Thomas Menino used the event in New York to push for proposed state legislation regulating commercial steam distribution systems that was progressing slowly. A young boy was severely burned two months earlier by a burst steam pipe in that city.
Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania has a network of more than of steam pipes operated by Veolia Energy Philadelphia, but the city had not had a similar incident for many years. In 1989, a steam explosion at 15th and Wood Streets sent debris into the air damaging some cars. In the wake of the New York City explosion, city officials credited the utility for the extended period of safe operations. == See also ==