Response In the immediate aftermath, Vancouver Mayor
Gregor Robertson initially attributed the situation to "a small group of troublemakers". The idea that anarchists were involved in the violence was rejected by
UBC political science professor
Glen Coulthard and others in a
Vancouver Sun article on June 24. "That this gets tagged as anarchist activity is just more of an assumption or bias that has been around for a long time," said Coulthard. "[A]narchists are a convenient scapegoat for the police to deflect responsibility for what happened," said another commentator. One critic indicated that authorities had made several mistakes in the planning for the crowd—among them allowing parked cars near the screens and leaving newspaper boxes nearby which could be used as projectiles. On June 20, Chu said "While we are still standing by that observation about the instigators, we are learning that most of the people that joined in the riot and that have now been charged represent a wider spectrum of young people, many of whom do not have criminal records." Goaltender
Roberto Luongo expressed a similar sentiment, stating that "those were not the real Vancouver fans that were doing that... I think it was isolated groups. It was tough to watch that something like that happened to the city." An Angus Reid poll soon after the riot showed that 90% of British Columbia residents were disgusted by the events of the riot. Streets were reportedly clean by 10 am, with volunteers having shown up with brooms and dustpans to clean the city. Boarded up windows were covered in apologies and defences of the city's reputation. In response, the
Hudson's Bay Company, a major retailer in the area, hosted a free pancake breakfast in thanks.
Criminal prosecution As many as 70 officers from eight different police agencies formed the Integrated Riot Investigation Team, tasked with sifting through hundreds of hours of video and other evidence to identify rioters. Several participants in the riots turned themselves in to police after their faces were broadcast on TV, including the person responsible for setting the first car on fire. More than 1,000,000 photos and over 1,000 hours of video recorded by citizens were sent to the Vancouver Police Department as evidence.
Insurance Corporation of British Columbia (ICBC) offered their facial-recognition software to the police in an attempt to aid in their criminal investigation of the riot. In 2012, the Information and Privacy Commissioner of British Columbia,
Elizabeth Denham, ruled that police could not use the software without a warrant requesting the information. By July 2013, police had recommended 1,204 criminal charges against 352 suspected rioters. In July 2015, over four years after the riots, the last two suspects were charged. Experts have pushed back against the theory that social media was the cause of the riot.
Christopher J. Schneider, a sociologist from the
University of British Columbia said that the social media usage was "crowd-sourced policing or lateral surveillance, where citizens were surveilling other citizens". Many of the photos and videos taken of the riot were posted to social media sites such as
Facebook and
YouTube. This led to an unprecedented community effort to identify and report rioters. The Vancouver Police department received more than one million photos and tips from civilians, The department issued a statement asking the public not to take justice into their own hands, saying that there was "a growing danger that the tools of social media will be used to mete out vigilante justice". Police encouraged those who were caught committing crimes on video to turn themselves in to avoid facing a public arrest. Additionally, the online effort to identify rioters sometimes identified minors, whose names cannot be made public in legal proceedings. An issue related to social media and the police investigation was that a number of people involved in the rioting were under the age of 18. Publishing the names of
young offenders is forbidden by the British Columbia legal system. On social media, however, the sharing of images and videos and public online shaming can identify underage riot participants. Schneider concurred, saying that "Many of the comments are horrific, threatening things that these people might not normally say... There is a profound disconnect between who we are online and in life. We are still learning how to be cyber citizens".
Financial losses branch remains open despite damages from the riots
CBC News reported that the destruction caused by the rioters was worse than the
1994 riot, which cost around $1.1 million in damages. In 2016, the ICBC won a lawsuit against 82 rioters, in which the defendants were found jointly liable for damages inflicted to automobiles during the riot. Of the defendants, 37 settled with the insurer, 35 received default judgements, and 10 went to trial. Nine of those ten were found liable. Sean Yates was the only defendant represented by a lawyer, and was found to be not liable due to insufficient evidence against him. This was despite a video of him throwing a
mannequin through the window of a burning car, which the judge compared to "kicking a dead horse" as the car was already destroyed.
Independent review An independent review commissioned by the province of British Columbia and the City of Vancouver released its 396-page report titled
The Night the City Became a Stadium on August 31, 2011. This report labeled alcohol consumption as a primary cause of the riot. Additionally, the report concluded that the
Vancouver Police Department's reinforcements arrived too late to control the crowd, although because the crowd had 155,000 people, it would be impossible for any sized police force to prevent the riot. == Media coverage ==