A Thousand Plateaus has been considered a major statement of post-structuralism and postmodernism.
Mark Poster writes that the work "contains promising elaborations of a postmodern theory of the social and political." Writing in the foreword to his translation, Massumi comments that the work "is less a critique than a positive exercise in the affirmative 'nomad' thought called for in
Anti-Oedipus." Massumi contrasts "nomad thought" with the "state philosophy... that has characterized Western metaphysics since
Plato". Deleuze critic Eugene Holland suggests that the work complicates the slogans and oppositions developed in its predecessor. Whereas
Anti-Oedipus created binaries such as molar/molecular, paranoid/schizophrenic, and
deterritorialization/
reterritorialization,
A Thousand Plateaus shows how such distinctions are operations on the surface of a deeper field with more complicated and multidimensional dynamics. In so doing, the book is less engaged with history than with topics like
biology and geology. Massumi writes that
A Thousand Plateaus differs drastically in tone, content, and composition from
Anti-Oedipus. In his view, the
schizoanalysis the authors practice is not so much a study of their "pathological condition", but a "positive process" that involves "inventive connection". Bill Readings appropriates the term "singularity" from
A Thousand Plateaus, "to indicate that there is no longer a subject-position available to function as the site of the conscious synthesis of sense-impressions." The sociologist
Nikolas Rose writes that Deleuze and Guattari articulate "the most radical alternative to the conventional image of subjectivity as coherent, enduring, and individualized". In 1997, the physicists
Alan Sokal and
Jean Bricmont asserted that the book contains many passages in which Deleuze and Guattari use "pseudo-scientific language". Writing about this "
science wars critique," Daniel Smith and
John Protevi contend that "much of their chapter on Deleuze consists of exasperated exclamations of incomprehension." Similarly, in a 2015 interview, British philosopher
Roger Scruton characterized
A Thousand Plateaus as "[a] huge, totally unreadable tome by somebody who can't write French." At the beginning of a short essay on postmodernism,
Jean-François Lyotard lists examples of what he describes as a desire "to put an end to experimentation", including a displeased reaction to
A Thousand Plateaus that he had read in a weekly literary magazine, which said that readers of philosophy "expect [...] to be "gratified with a little sense". Behind this "slackening" desire to constrain language use, Lyotard identifies a "desire for a return to
terror." Digital media theorist
Janet Murray links the work to the aesthetic of
hypertext. Gaming and electronic literature expert
Espen Aarseth draws parallels between Deleuze and Guattari's idea of the rhizome and semiotician
Umberto Eco's idea of the net. Christopher Miller criticizes Deleuze and Guattari's use of "second-hand" anthropological sources without providing the reader with contextualization of the colonialist "mission" that led to their writing. Timothy Laurie says that this claim is inaccurate, but that Deleuze & Guattari should extend that same "rigor" to uncovering the political and economic entanglements which contextualize academic philosophy. ==Influence==