Identity Michael Astour suggested identifying Adad-Nirari with
Adad-Nirari of Nuhašše; a hypothesis supported by
Thomas Richter, who believes that Adad-Nirari ruled Qatna through a
šakkanakku (military governor) called Lullu, citing that the latter's name appears in the Qatanite inventories at the time of Adad-Nirari. According to Richter, Adad-Nirari of Nuhašše ruled the second Syrian power after Mitanni, and was removed by the Hittites which gave Qatna its independence back . This theory is debated; the
Shattiwaza treaty between
Mitanni and the Hittites mentioned Qatna independently from Nuhašše during the Hittite king
Šuppiluliuma I's first Syrian war; If Qatna was part of the Nuhaššite kingdom, its submission to the Hittites would not have been mentioned separately.
Jacques Freu rejected Richter's hypothesis; citing different arguments, he concluded that Adad-Nirari of Nuhašše was a contemporary of Idadnda of Qatna who ruled during the first Syrian war, a successor of the Qatanite Adad-Nirari. ==References==