Vedic priesthood

The older references uniformly indicate '' as the presiding priest, with perhaps only the adhvaryu'' as his assistant in the earliest times. The phrase "seven hotars" is found more than once in the Rigveda. Rigveda 2.1.2 states it as follows, The above verse enumerates the priests as the ', ', '', agnīdʰ'', ' and '. Rigveda 10.71.11 describes the specialized tasks of the four types of 'companions' in a sacrifice: Vedic (Shrauta) yajnas are typically performed by four priests of the Vedic priesthood: the hota, the adhvaryu, the udgata and the Brahma. The functions associated with the priests are: • The Hotri recites invocations and litanies drawn from the Rigveda.These invocations could consist of single verses ('), strophes (triples called ' or pairs called pragātha), or entire hymns (sukta). Hota uses three Rig verses, the introductory verse, the accompanying verse and benediction as the third. Each action is accompanied by supplicative or benedictive formulas (yajus), drawn from the yajurveda. Over time, the role of the adhvaryu grew in importance, and many verses of the '' were incorporated, either intact or adapted, into the texts of the yajurveda''. • The Udgata ('''''') is the chanter of hymns set to melodies and music (sāman) drawn from the Samaveda. The udgatar, like the hota, chants the introductory, accompanying and benediction hymns. The rgvedic Brahmanas, Aitareya and Kausitaki, specify seven hotrakas to recite shastras (litanies): '', brāhmanācchamsin, maitrāvaruna'', ', ', agnīdh and acchāvāka. They also carry a legend to explain the origin of the offices of the subrahmanya and the grāvastut. Purohita The requirements of the fully developed ritual were rigorous enough that only professional priests could perform them adequately. Thus, whereas in the earliest times, the true sacrificer, or intended beneficiary of the rite, might have been a direct participant, in Vedic times he was only a sponsor, the yajamāna, with the '' or brahman taking his stead in the ritual. In this seconding lay the origins of the growing importance of the purohita (literally, "one who is placed in front"). It was not unusual for a purohita to be the or brahman at a sacrifice for his master, besides conducting other more domestic (gṛhya|) rituals for him also. In latter days, with the disappearance of Vedic ritual practice, purohita'' has become a generic term for "priest". ==Assistants==

In the systematic expositions of the shrauta sutras, which date to the fifth or sixth century BCE, the assistants are classified into four groups associated with each of the four chief priests, although the classifications are artificial and in some cases incorrect: • With the '''': • the maitrāvaruna • the acchāvāka • the grāvastut (praising the Soma stones) • With the '''': • the '''''' (who chants the Prastâva) • the '''''' ("averter") • the subrahmanya • With the adhvaryu: • the '''''' • the '''''' • the '''''' (who pours the Soma juice into the receptacles ) • With the brahman: • the brāhmanācchamsin • the agnīdh (priest who kindles the sacred fire) • the '''''' ("purifier") ==Philological comparisons==

Comparison with the sacred texts of Zoroastrianism, a distinct religion with the same origins, shows the antiquity of terms for priests such as *atharwan (Vedic atharvan; cognate to Avestan ) and *zhautar (Ved. hotar; Av. ) 'invoker, sacrificer'. While *zhautar is well understood, the original meaning of *atharwan is unknown. The word atharvan appears in the Rig Veda (e.g., in RV 6.16.13 where Agni is said to have been churned by Atharvan from the mind of every poet). In the Younger Avesta, appears in a context that suggests "missionary," perhaps by metathesis from Indo-Iranian *arthavan "possessing purpose." However, a recent theory indicates that Proto Indo-Iranian *atharwan likely represents a substrate word from the unknown language of the BMAC civilization of Central Asia. It can be analyzed as BMAC *athar- plus the Indo-Iranian possessive suffix *-wan, in which case *atharwan would be "one who possesses *athar". Though the meaning of *athar is unknown, Pinault speculates that it meant "superior force" and connects it to the Tocharian word for "hero". In the Upanishads, appears for example in , a compound of and , either two eponymous rishis or their family names. In present-day Indian Zoroastrian (Parsi) tradition the word athornan is used to distinguish the priesthood from the laity (the behdin). These subdivisions (in the historical Indian context, castes), and the terms used to describe them, are relatively recent developments specific to Indian Zoroastrians and although the words themselves are old, the meaning that they came to have for the Parsis are influenced by their centuries-long coexistence with Hinduism. It appears then that the Indian Zoroastrian priests re-adopted the older (in preference to the traditional, and very well attested derivative āsron) for its similarity to Hinduism's , which the Parsi priests then additionally assumed was derived from Avestan ātar 'fire'. This folk etymology may "have been prompted by what is probably a mistaken assumption of the importance of fire in the ancient Indo-Iranian religion". The division of priestly functions among the Hotar, the Udgatar and the Adhvaryu has been compared to the Celtic priesthood as reported by Strabo, with the Druids as high priests, the Bards doing the chanting and the Vates performing the actual sacrifice. ==See also==