estimates published by the
U.S. Census Bureau. States with median gross rents higher than the United States as a whole are in dark green. In the U.S., households are commonly defined in terms of the amount of
realized income they earn relative to the
Area Median Income or AMI. Localized AMI figures are calculated annually based on a survey of comparably sized households within geographic ranges known as
metropolitan statistical areas, as defined by the US Office of Management and Budget. For U.S. housing subsidies, households are categorized by federal law as follows: • Moderate income households earn between 80% and 120% of AMI. •
Low income households earn between 50% and 80% of AMI. • Very low income households earn no more than 50% of AMI. Some states and cities in the United States operate a variety of affordable housing programs, including supportive housing programs, transitional housing programs and rent subsidies as part of public assistance programs. Local and state governments can adapt these income limits when administering local affordable housing programs; however, U.S. federal programs must adhere to the definitions above. For the Section 8 voucher program, the maximum household contribution to rent can be as high as 40% gross income.
Housing supply and price trends The U.S. housing market experienced a sharp contraction in for-sale inventory during the COVID-19 pandemic, followed by a partial recovery. According to an analysis by the
Pew Research Center using data from Realtor.com, there were more than 1.2 million active for-sale listings on local multiple listing services (MLS) on a typical day in September 2019. By September 2023, active listings had declined by 42.7% to approximately 702,000. Inventory rebounded in 2024, reaching about 941,000 active listings in September, a 34.0% increase from the previous year, though still below pre-pandemic levels. The recovery in housing supply has been uneven across the country. In September 2024, 78.9% of the more than 900 local markets tracked by Realtor.com had fewer active listings than in September 2019, while 92.2% had more active listings than in September 2023. The NLIHC promotes a guideline of 30% of household income as the upper limit of affordability. According to a 2012 National Low Income Housing Coalition report, in every community across the United States "rents are unaffordable to full-time working people." However, by using an indicator, such as the Median Multiple indicator which rates affordability of housing by dividing the median house price by gross [before tax] annual median household income), without considering the extreme disparities between the incomes of
high-net-worth individual (HNWI) and those in the lower quintiles, a distorted picture of real affordability is created. Using this indicator—which rates housing affordability on a scale of 0 to 5, with categories 3 and under affordable—in 2012, the United States overall market was considered 3 (affordable). Since 1996, while incomes in the upper quintile increased, incomes in the lower quintile households decreased creating negative outcomes in housing affordability. Before the
real estate bubble of 2007, the median household paid $658 per month in total housing costs (Census 2002). A total of 20% of households were deemed to be living in unaffordable housing: Nine percent of all households are renters in unaffordable housing, and eleven percent of all households are homeowners with high housing costs. In the
2000 U.S. census, the median homeowner with a mortgage (70% of homeowners and 48% of census respondents) spent $1,088 each month, or 21.7% of household income, on housing costs. The median homeowner without a mortgage (30% of all homeowners (80% of elderly homeowners) and 20% of respondents) spent $295 per month, or 10.5% of household income, on housing costs.
Federal subsidies and other forms of government housing assistance The federal government in the U.S. provides subsidies to make housing more affordable. Financial assistance is provided for homeowners through the
mortgage interest tax deduction and for lower income households through housing subsidy programs. In the 1970s the federal government spent similar amounts on tax reductions for homeowners as it did on subsidies for low-income housing. However, by 2005, tax reductions had risen to $120 billion per year, representing nearly 80 percent of all federal housing assistance. The Advisory Panel on Federal Tax Reform for
President Bush proposed reducing the
home mortgage interest deduction in a 2005 report. Housing assistance from the federal government for lower income households can be divided into three parts: • "Tenant based" subsidies given to an individual household, known as the
Section 8 program • "Project based" subsidies given to the owner of housing units that must be rented to lower income households at affordable rates, and •
Public Housing, which is usually owned and operated by the government. (Some public housing projects are managed by subcontracted private agencies.) "Project based" subsidies are also known by their section of the U.S. Housing Act or the
Housing Act of 1949, and include Section 8, Section 236, Section 221(d)(3), Section 202 for elderly households, Section 515 for rural renters, Section 514/516 for farmworkers and Section 811 for people with disabilities. There are also housing subsidies through the Section 8 program that are project based. The
United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and USDA
Rural Development administer these programs. HUD and USDA Rural Development programs have ceased to produce large numbers of units since the 1980s. Since 1986, the
Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program has been the primary federal program to produce affordable units; however, the housing produced in this program is less affordable than the former HUD programs.
Inclusionary housing development regulations Another program is
inclusionary housing—an ordinance that requires housing developers to reserve a percentage between 10 and 30% of housing units from new or rehabilitated projects to be rented or sold at a below market rate for low and moderate-income households. One of the most unusual US public housing initiatives was the development of subsidized middle-class housing during the late
New Deal (1940–42) under the auspices of the
Mutual Ownership Defense Housing Division of the
Federal Works Agency under the direction of
Colonel Lawrence Westbrook. These eight projects were purchased by the residents after the
Second World War and as of 2009 seven of the projects continue to operate as mutual housing corporations owned by their residents. These projects are among the very few definitive success stories in the history of the US public housing effort. Governmental and quasi-governmental agencies that contribute to the work of ensuring the existence of a steady supply of affordable housing in the United States are the U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), USDA
Rural Development, the
Federal Home Loan Bank,
Fannie Mae, and
Freddie Mac. Housing Partnership Network is an umbrella organization of 100+ housing and community development nonprofits. Important private sector institutions worth consulting are the
National Association of Home Builders, the National Affordable Housing Management Association (NAHMA), the Council for Affordable and Rural Housing (CARH) and the
National Association of Realtors. Valuable research institutions with staff dedicated to the analysis of "affordable housing" includes: The
Center for Housing Policy,
Brookings Institution, the
Urban Institute and the
Joint Center for Housing Studies at
Harvard University and the
Furman Center for Real Estate and Urban Policy at
New York University, and the
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. Several of these institutions (the Fannie Mae Foundation, Urban Institute, Brookings Institution Metropolitan Policy Program, Enterprise Community Partners, LISC, the Harvard Joint Center for Housing Studies, and others) partnered to create KnowledgePlex, an online information resource devoted to affordable housing and community development issues. ==See also==