There are two main sources of modern Albanian
historiography: intellectuals from the
Albanian National Awakening (
Rilindja) period and historians from the regime of the
People's Socialist Republic of Albania. From 1878 onward, the national Awakening period galvanised Albanian intellectuals among some who emerged as the first modern Albanian scholars and they were preoccupied with overcoming linguistic and cultural differences between Albanian subgroups (Gegs and Tosks) and religious divisions (Muslim and Christians). Two major historical works written by Albanians during this early phase of modern historiography within Albania are Athanase Gegaj's ''L'Albanie et l'Invasion turque au XVe siècle'' (1937) and
Fan Noli's George Castrioti Scanderbeg (1405-1468) (1947), both written outside Albania.
Albanian socialist historiography (1945-1992) Albanian socialist historiography was associated with the Albanian state building project of national legitimation. Of Stalinist Albania,
Bernd Jürgen Fischer stated that it produced good historians though not always good history. Drawing upon themes of national struggles established during the Rilindja period, Albanian socialist historiography centred itself upon the main narrative of nationhood that within history writing included Marxist historical materialism and nationalism. • Military historians: Ndreci Plasari and Shyqri Ballvora • Political historians:
Aleks Buda,
Stefanaq Pollo, Arben Puto and Luan Omari. Aleks Buda, who also became a president of the
Academy of Sciences of Albania, is sometimes considered as a founder of the Albanian post WWII historiography. Buda belonged to a small group of intellectuals allowed by the Albanian communist regime to have access to foreign literature in order to use them to prepare new ideological and theoretical directives for the rest of their colleagues.
Post communist Albanian Historiography When Albanian socialist historiography dealt with people, it tended to see things black and white. The legacy of understanding history through such dichotomies has remained for a majority of Albanians which for example they view Skanderbeg and the anti-Ottoman forces as "good" while the Ottomans are "bad". Due to that legacy,
Robert Elsie emphasized that there was no reliable and objective historiography in Albania which could serve as a basis for his historical dictionary of Albania he compiled and published in 2010.
Oliver Jens Schmitt stated that the post-World War II Albanian regime propagated the official version of the past using all available means. People in Albania were subjected to state organized indoctrination and propaganda. Schmitt explained that because of political influence it was impossible to organize open discussion about socialist historiography, while those who attempted to criticize it would be denounced often as non-professionals or foreigners with evil objectives. The influence of such historical myths still remain which for example in 2009 Schmitt was severely criticised in Albania after producing an academic biography that challenged the traditional Albanian concept of Skanderbeg. Post-communist Albanian historiography has attempted to move away from previous political influences of the Hoxha era and shift the discipline toward a more scientific methodological direction, however, themes of national struggles continue. Political pressures have been placed upon contemporary Albanian historiography. == Themes ==