The term allelopathy from the Greek-derived compounds
- () and
- () (meaning "mutual harm" or "suffering"), was first used in 1937 by the Austrian professor
Hans Molisch in the book (The Effect of Plants on Each Other - Allelopathy) published in German. In 1971, Whittaker and Feeny published a review in the journal
Science, which proposed an expanded definition of allelochemical interactions that would incorporate all chemical interactions among organisms. In 1984, Elroy Leon Rice in his
monograph on allelopathy enlarged the definition to include all direct positive or negative effects of a plant on another plant or on micro-organisms by the liberation of biochemicals into the natural environment. Over the next ten years, the term was used by other researchers to describe broader chemical interactions between organisms, and by 1996 the International Allelopathy Society (IAS) defined allelopathy as "Any process involving secondary metabolites produced by plants, algae, bacteria and fungi that influences the growth and development of agriculture and biological systems." In more recent times, plant researchers have begun to switch back to the original definition of substances that are produced by one plant that inhibit another plant. In 1832, the Swiss botanist
De Candolle suggested that crop plant
exudates were responsible for an agriculture problem called
soil sickness. Allelopathy is not universally accepted among ecologists. Many have argued that its effects cannot be distinguished from the exploitation competition that occurs when two (or more) organisms attempt to use the same limited resource, to the detriment of one or both. In the 1970s, great effort went into distinguishing competitive and allelopathic effects by some researchers, while in the 1990s others argued that the effects were often interdependent and could not readily be distinguished. In 1994, M.C. Nilsson at the
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences in Umeå showed in a field study that allelopathy exerted by
Empetrum hermaphroditum reduced growth of
Scots pine seedlings by ~ 40%, and that below-ground resource competition by
E. hermaphroditum accounted for the remaining growth reduction. For this work she inserted PVC-tubes into the ground to reduce below-ground competition or added charcoal to soil surface to reduce the impact of allelopathy, as well as a treatment combining the two methods. However, the use of activated carbon to make inferences about allelopathy has itself been criticized because of the potential for the charcoal to directly affect plant growth by altering nutrient availability. Some high-profile work on allelopathy has been mired in controversy. For example, the discovery that (−)-
catechin was purportedly responsible for the allelopathic effects of the invasive weed
Centaurea stoebe was greeted with much fanfare after being published in
Science in 2003. One scientist, Dr.
Alastair Fitter, was quoted as saying that this study was "so convincing that it will 'now place allelopathy firmly back on center stage.'" Subsequent studies from the original lab have not been able to replicate the results from these retracted studies, nor have most independent studies conducted in other laboratories. Thus, it is doubtful whether the levels of (−)-catechin found in soils are high enough to affect competition with neighboring plants. The proposed mechanism of action (acidification of the
cytoplasm through
oxidative damage) has also been criticized, on the basis that (−)-catechin is actually an antioxidant. ==Examples==