Academic scholarship The academic study of new religious movements is known as 'new religions studies' (NRS). The study draws from the disciplines of
anthropology,
psychiatry,
history,
psychology,
sociology,
religious studies, and
theology. Barker noted that there are five sources of information on NRMs: the information provided by such groups themselves, that provided by ex-members as well as the friends and relatives of members, organisations that collect information on NRMs, the mainstream media, and academics studying such phenomena. The study of new religions is unified by its topic of interest rather than by its
methodology, and is therefore
interdisciplinary in nature. A sizeable body of scholarly literature on new religions has been published, most of it produced by
social scientists. Among the disciplines that NRS utilises are anthropology, history, psychology, religious studies, and sociology. Of these approaches, sociology played a particularly prominent role in the development of the field, resulting in it being initially confined largely to a narrow array of sociological questions. This came to change in later scholarship, which began to apply theories and methods initially developed for examining more mainstream religions to the study of new ones. Most research has been directed toward those new religions that attract public controversy. Less controversial NRMs tend to be the subject of less scholarly research. It has also been noted that scholars of new religions often avoid researching certain movements that scholars from other backgrounds study. The
feminist spirituality movement is usually examined by scholars of
women's studies, African-American new religions by scholars of
Africana studies, and Native American new religions by scholars of
Native American studies.
Definitions and terminology in Bosnia, 2007
J. Gordon Melton argued that "new religious movements" should be defined by the way dominant religious and secular forces within a given society treat them. According to him, NRMs constituted "those religious groups that have been found, from the perspective of the dominant religious community (and in the West that is almost always a form of Christianity), to be not just different, but unacceptably different". Barker cautioned against Melton's approach, arguing that negating the "newness" of "new religious movements" raises problems, for it is "the very fact that NRMs are new that explains many of the key characteristics they display".
George Chryssides favors "simple" definition; for him, NRM is an organisation founded within the past 150 or so years, which cannot be easily classified within one of the world's main religious traditions. Scholars of religion
Olav Hammer and
Mikael Rothstein argued that "new religions are just young religions" and as a result, they are "not inherently different" from mainstream and established religious movements, with the differences between the two having been greatly exaggerated by the media and popular perceptions. Melton has stated that those NRMs that "were offshoots of older religious groups... tended to resemble their parent groups far more than they resembled each other". One question that faces scholars of religion is when a new religious movement ceases to be "new". As noted by Barker, "In the first century, Christianity was new, in the seventh century Islam was new, in the eighteenth century Methodism was new, in the nineteenth century the Seventh-day Adventists, Christadelphians, and Jehovah's Witnesses were new; in the twenty-first century the Unification Church, the ISKCON, and Scientology are beginning to look old". The
Roman Catholic Church has observed that the growth of sects and new religious movements is one of the "most noticeable" and "highly complex" developments in recent years, and in relation to the
ecumenical movement, their "desire for peaceful relations with the Catholic Church may be weak or non-existent". Some NRMs are strongly counter-cultural and 'alternative' in the society where they appear, while others are far more similar to a society's established traditional religions. Generally, Christian denominations are not seen as new religious movements; nevertheless, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, the Jehovah's Witnesses, Christian Science, and the Shakers have been studied as NRMs. The same situation with
Jewish religious movements, when
Reform Judaism and newer divisions have been named among NRM. There are also problems in the use of "religion" within the term "new religious movements". This is because various groups, particularly active within the New Age milieu, have many traits in common with different NRMs but emphasise
personal development and
humanistic psychology, and are not clearly "religious" in nature. Since at least the early 2000s, most sociologists of religion have used the term "new religious movement" in order to avoid the pejorative undertones of terms like "
cult" and "
sect". These are words that have been used in different ways by different groups. For instance, from the nineteenth century onward a number of sociologists used the terms "cult" and "sect" in very specific ways. The sociologist
Ernst Troeltsch for instance differentiated "churches" from "sect" by claiming that the former term should apply to groups that stretch across social strata while "sects" typically contain converts from socially disadvantaged sectors of society. The term "cult" is used in reference to devotion or dedication to a particular person or place. For instance, within the Roman Catholic Church, devotion to
Mary, mother of Jesus may be termed the "
Cult of Mary". It is also used in non-religious contexts to refer to
fandoms
devoted to television shows like
The Prisoner,
The X-Files, and
Buffy the Vampire Slayer. In the United States, people began to use "cult" in a pejorative manner, to refer to Spiritualism and Christian Science during the 1890s. As commonly used, for instance in sensationalist tabloid articles, the term "cult" continues to have pejorative associations. The term "new religions" is a
calque of , a Japanese term developed to describe the proliferation of
Japanese new religions in the years following the Second World War. From Japan this term was translated and used by several American authors, including
Jacob Needleman, to describe the range of groups that appeared in the San Francisco Bay Area during the 1960s. This term, amongst others, was adopted by Western scholars as an alternative to "cult". However, "new religious movements" has failed to gain widespread public usage in the manner that "cult" has. Other terms that have been employed for many NRMs are "alternative religion" and "alternative spirituality", something used to convey the difference between these groups and established or mainstream religious movements while at the same time evading the problem posed by groups that are not particularly new. The 1970s was the era of the so-called "
cult wars", led by "cult-watching groups". The efforts of the anti-cult movement condensed a
moral panic around the concept of cults. Public fears around
Satanism, in particular, came to be known as a distinct phenomenon, the "
Satanic Panic". Consequently, scholars such as Eileen Barker,
James T. Richardson,
Timothy Miller and
Catherine Wessinger argued that the term "cult" had become too laden with negative connotations, and "advocated dropping its use in academia". A number of alternatives to the term "new religious movement" are used by some scholars. These include "alternative religious movements" (Miller), "emergent religions" (Ellwood) and "marginal religious movements" (Harper and Le Beau). Some historical events have been:
Anti-Mormonism, the
persecution of Jehovah's Witnesses, the
persecution of Baháʼís, and the
persecution of Falun Gong. In India there have been mob killings of members of the
Ananda Marga group. Such violence can also be administered by the state. In Iran, followers of the Baháʼí Faith have faced persecution, while the Ahmadiyya have faced similar violence in Pakistan. Since 1999, the persecution of Falun Gong in China has been severe.
Ethan Gutmann interviewed over 100 witnesses and estimated that 65,000 Falun Gong practitioners were killed for their organs from 2000 to 2008.
Christian countercult movement In the 1930s, Christian critics of NRMs began referring to them as "cults". The 1938 book
The Chaos of Cults by Jan Karel van Baalen (1890–1968), an ordained minister in the
Christian Reformed Church in North America, was especially influential. In the US, the
Christian Research Institute was founded in 1960 by
Walter Ralston Martin to counter opposition to evangelical Christianity and has come to focus on criticisms of NRMs. Presently the Christian countercult movement opposes most NRMs because of theological differences. It is closely associated with
evangelical Christianity. In his book
The Kingdom of the Cults (1965), Christian scholar Walter Ralston Martin examines a large number of new religious movements; included are major groups such as Christian Science, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, Jehovah's Witnesses,
Armstrongism,
Theosophy, the Baháʼí Faith,
Unitarian Universalism, Scientology, the Unity Church, as well as minor groups including various New Age groups and those based on
Eastern religions. The beliefs of other world religions such as Islam and Buddhism are also discussed. He covers each group's history and teachings, and contrasts them with those of mainstream Christianity.
Anti-cult movement In the 1970s and 1980s, some NRMs as well as some non-religious groups came under opposition by the newly organised anti-cult movement, which mainly charged them with
psychological abuse of their own members.
Popular culture and news media New religious movements and cults have appeared as themes or subjects in literature and popular culture, while notable representatives of such groups have produced a large body of literary works. Beginning in the 1700s authors in the English-speaking world began introducing members of "cults" as
antagonists. In the twentieth century, concern for the rights and feelings of religious minorities led authors to most often invent fictional cults for their villains to be members of. Fictional cults continue to be popular in film, television, and gaming in the same way, while some popular works treat new religious movements in a serious manner. An article on the categorisation of new religious movements in US print media published by
The Association for the Sociology of Religion (formerly the American
Catholic Sociological Society), criticises the print media for failing to recognise social-scientific efforts in the area of new religious movements, and its tendency to use popular or anti-cultist definitions rather than social-scientific insight, and asserts that "The failure of the print media to recognize social-scientific efforts in the area of religious movement organizations impels us to add yet another failing mark to the media report card Weiss (1985) has constructed to assess the media's reporting of the social sciences". == See also ==