The
Upanishads speak about the two-fold Brahman, the one with attributes called the
Saguna Brahman, and the other without attributes called the
Nirguna Brahman only to deny and accept these two to state that Brahman is One.
Brahman is called
Nirguna because Brahman has not the three
Gunas of
Prakrti, and not because Brahman has got no
gunas absolutely; in order to prove the substantive existence of Brahman (
prameya), Brahman is called
Saguna even though there is absence of
Gunas in Brahman (
aprameya). Brahman is One, and Oneness cannot be confounded with non-oneness; also oneness does not require another oneness to differentiate through second oneness or a third to differentiate the second oneness, otherwise there will be no end or conclusion. This fallacy is
Anavastha or infinite regress. The
Vedas advise that Brahman must be looked at in one and one mode only. In created things differences are of three kinds – 1) Existing in oneself, 2) difference in species and 3) difference in genus. In three words denoting a) 'oneness of Brahman', the
svajatiya-bheda, b) 'restriction', the
svagata-bheda and 3) 'rejection of duality', the
vijatiya-bheda, these three differences are negated by the Sruti texts (
Panchadasi Stanzas II.20&21). The created things are many, a chain of causes and effects is also present, but to avoid the fallacy of
anavastha, it is necessary to consider Brahman as the root cause.
Vedanta does not admit the existence of the relation of (the inseparable inherence or concomitant cause or combining force) as subsisting between two different entities such as substance and qualities. In his Brahmasutra-bhashya II.ii.13,
Sankara explains that if a relation is to be admitted to connect two things, then another would be necessary to connect it with either of the two entities that it intended to connect. Thus, there are two kinds of
Anavastha - the
Pramaniki, the valid infinite, and the
Apramaniki, the vicious infinite. Knowledge is
Chaitanya (
anubhuti) i.e.
Consciousness, and consciousness reveals the reality of objects. An object cannot be talked about if it does not exist. Any attempt to find out whether the second knowledge that reveals the first knowledge identical with it is a separate knowledge or not leads to
anavastha. Because the first knowledge is a revelation, there is no second knowledge that reveals the first knowledge.
Consciousness cannot be perceived, it perceives itself and is not perceived by any greater source; the
logical fallacy of
Anavastha (an endless series of cause and effect) would exist if it were to be said that Consciousness requires another source of perception (Devi GitaIV.12-13). If there is no eternal First Cause, the logical fallacy of
Anavastha Dosha is inevitable. Brahman, the First cause, has no origin (Brahma Sutra II.3.9) Thus, a thing cannot be at the same time the object and the subject of action. Consciousness i.e.
Chaitanya, is self-illuminating and it illuminates others by its own illumination.
Kumārila Bhaṭṭa enquires, if an omniscient person exists that person can become comprehensible only to some other omniscient personality, and so on. ==Yoga concept==