Early history In 1850, Alexander Culbertson collected several fossils from the area around
Fort Laramie, Wyoming. His father, Joseph, presented them to the
Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia. Two of the fossils were named by anatomist and palaeontologist
Joseph Leidy. One of them was a small skull fragment, preserving the third and fourth left
premolars. It was determined to be a new species, and was designated the holotype of a new taxon,
Archaeotherium mortoni. Its
generic name derives from the Greek αρχαιο ("ancient") and θήριον ("beast"). The
type species,
A. mortoni, was named after
Samuel George Morton, then the president of the
Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia. Several more complete specimens were described in an 1853 paper, also by Leidy: a fragment of a mature specimen's skull, preserving in their entirety the two front
molars and parts of the last
molar and last
premolar, all on both sides; and the rear of a young individual's skull, broken in two and missing the upper left half of the skull (including the
zygomatic arch). Though perplexed by the anatomy it displayed, Leidy suggested that it was related to
Entelodon magnus from Eurasia, if it did not represent the same taxon outright. Shortly thereafter, Edward Drinker Cope named another new species,
Elotherium ramosum. Subsequently, he reassigned both
E. crassum and
E. ramosum to a genus of their own,
Pelonax. In 1951, James Reid MacDonald lumped
Pelonax into
Archaeotherium, though opted to retain it as a subgenus. In 2007, Scott Foss synonymised
Megachoerus with
Archaeotherium. for remains formerly assigned to
Daeodon however, Choerodon
is preoccupied by a genus of wrasse. C. calkinsi
is now regarded as a species of Archaeotherium
, and may represent part of its own subgenus. By 2007, Scaptohyus
was regarded as a junior synonym of Archaeotherium
. It may be the same taxon as A. trippensis
. A posthumous paper by Edward Drinker Cope, published in 1915, listed the same taxon as Entelodon imperator
. In a 1909 revision of Entelodontidae, Olaf August Peterson resurrected Archaeotherium
as a genus. He suggested that Archaeotherium
and Entelodon
could be distinguished by geography, as the former was North American and the latter was Eurasian. In 1940, William Berryman Scott and Glenn Lowell Jepsen noted strong similarities between the two genera, though they stopped short of synonymising them due to the incompleteness of the latter. In 1979, the relationship between the two genera was re-examined by French palaeontologist Michel Brunet. He contended that the differences between Archaeotherium
and Entelodon
were insufficient, and that the two genera should be synonymised; in this case, Entelodon'', being named earlier, would take priority. This total synonymy has not been followed by subsequent authors, though Scott Foss noted that it remained a topic for investigation. a family whose exact taxonomic position has long been disputed. Similarities to members of
Suina were recognised as far back as 1853. Since then, entelodontids have mostly been regarded as close relatives of
Suidae (pigs) within Suina/Suiformes. Below is a reproduction of the Yu
et al.. cladogram of Cetancodontamorpha: }} }} }} }} }} }} }} }}|label1=
Cetacodontamorpha}}In 1996,
Spencer G. Lucas and Robert J. Emry suggested that
Archaeotherium represented the terminal stage of a North American entelodont clade, which became extinct and was subsequently replaced by an Asian clade (itself ending with
Daeodon) which entered North America near the end of the Oligocene. In 2007, Scott Foss instead proposed that
Archaeotherium represents a late stage of a continuous North American lineage, beginning with
Brachyhyops and terminating in
Daeodon. Conversely, Yu
et al.. (2023) recovered
Archaeotherium as belonging to a
polytomy with
Brachyhyops and a clade consisting of
Entelodon and
Paraentelodon. ==Description==