The article prevents
free voting and
floor crossing by
Members of Parliament, stipulating that
MPs who vote against their party automatically lose their seats. As a result of Article 70, Bangladesh's parliament has largely functioned as a
rubber stamp for actions taken by the ruling party or coalition. It has also been unable to hold a
no confidence vote to remove a prime minister. The provision is contrary to the norms of
Westminster systems, as seen in the parliaments of the
United Kingdom,
Pakistan and
Australia. In Bangladesh, the parliament typically reflects the will of the government, rather than vice versa, as is in the case in a well-functioning Westminster system. This also runs counter to the norms of other democratic systems, such as the
German Bundestag and the
Japanese Diet. Critics argue that Article 70 contradicts
fundamental rights in the constitution, including
freedom of speech and
freedom of conscience. The lack of accountability in parliament grants sweeping powers to the
Prime Minister of Bangladesh, which is susceptible to
dictatorship. Without the option of a no-confidence motion, the institutional checks and balances on a prime minister's power are significantly limited, as there are few remedies by which a Bangladeshi prime minister can be legally dismissed. ==Reform==