In the early 1890s, two meetings established the need for federation and set the framework for this to occur. An informal meeting attended by official representatives from the Australasian colonies was held in 1890. This led to the first
National Australasian Convention, meeting in Sydney in 1891. New Zealand was represented at both the conference and the Convention, although its delegates indicated that it would be unlikely to join the Federation at its foundation, but it would probably be interested in doing so at a later date.
Australasian Federal Conference of 1890 The Australasian Federal Conference of 1890 met at the instigation of Parkes. Accounts of its origin commonly commence with
Lord Carrington, the
Governor of New South Wales, goading the ageing Parkes at a luncheon on 15 June 1889. Parkes reportedly boasted that he "could confederate these colonies in twelve months". Carrington retorted, "Then why don't you do it? It would be a glorious finish to your life." Parkes the next day wrote to the
Premier of Victoria,
Duncan Gillies, offering to advance the cause of Federation. Gillies's response was predictably cool, given the reluctance of Parkes to bring
New South Wales into the Federal Council. In October Parkes travelled north to Brisbane and met with Griffith and Sir
Thomas McIlwraith. On the return journey, he stopped just south of the colonial border, and delivered the historic
Tenterfield Oration on 24 October 1889 in
Tenterfield's
School of Arts, stating that the time had come for the colonies to consider Australian federation. Through the latter part of 1889, the premiers and governors corresponded and agreed for an informal meeting to be called. The membership was: New South Wales, Parkes (Premier) and
William McMillan (Colonial Treasurer); Victoria, Duncan Gillies (Premier) and
Alfred Deakin (Chief Secretary); Queensland, Sir
Samuel Griffith (Leader of the Opposition) and
John Murtagh Macrossan (Colonial Secretary); South Australia, Dr.
John Cockburn (Premier) and
Thomas Playford (Leader of the Opposition); Tasmania,
Andrew Inglis Clark (Attorney-General) and
Stafford Bird (Treasurer); Western Australia, Sir
James George Lee Steere (Speaker); New Zealand, Captain
William Russell (Colonial Secretary) and Sir
John Hall. in the gardens of the Victorian Parliament House in Melbourne. The tree was planted in 1890 by Sir Henry Parkes to commemorate the meeting of the Australian Federal Conference. When the conference met at the Victorian Parliament in Melbourne on 6 February, the delegates were confronted with a scorching summer maximum temperature of in the shade. The Conference debated whether or not the time was ripe to proceed with federation. While some of the delegates agreed it was, the smaller states were not as enthusiastic. Thomas Playford from South Australia indicated the tariff question and lack of popular support as hurdles. Similarly, Sir James Lee Steere from Western Australia and the New Zealand delegates suggested there was little support for federation in their respective colonies. and
Fiji rejecting the offer to join the Federation, with
Zealandia referencing Australia's
origins as a penal colony A basic question at this early assembly was how to combine federalism and responsible government. Parkes suggested the Canadian model, which federated with the
British North America Act, 1867, to be similarly adopted in Australia. However, delegates from the smaller states were not enthusiastic, with
John Alexander Cockburn of South Australia seeing the Canadian model as a "coercive" and "homogeneous National Union".
Andrew Inglis Clark, a long-time admirer of American federal institutions, introduced the
US Constitution as an example of the protection of States' rights. He presented it as an alternative to the Canadian model, arguing that Canada was "an instance of amalgamation rather than Federation." A model closer to that of the United States was endorsed, with states able to act completely independently apart from those limited powers transferred to the federal government and where each state would be represented equally in a strong second chamber—the Senate.
Clark's draft constitution , Andrew Inglis Clark had given considerable thought towards a suitable constitution for Australia. In May 1890, he travelled to London to conduct an appeal on behalf of the
Government of Tasmania before the
Privy Council. During this trip, he began writing a draft constitution, taking the main provisions of the
British North America Act, 1867 and its supplements up through 1890, the US Constitution, the
Federal Council of Australasia Act, and various Australian colonial constitutions. Clark returned from London by way of
Boston, Massachusetts, where he held discussions about his draft with
Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., and
Moncure Conway among others. Clark's draft introduced the nomenclature and form which was subsequently adopted: • The Australian Federation is described as the Commonwealth of Australia • There are three separate and equal branches – the Parliament, the Executive, and the Judicature. • The Legislature consists of a House of Representatives and a Senate • It specified the
separation of powers and the
division of powers between the Federal and State governments. Upon his return to Hobart in early November 1890, with the technical aid of
W. O. Wise, the Tasmanian Parliamentary Draftsman, Clark completed the final form of the Draft Constitution and had a number of copies printed. In February 1891, Clark circulated copies of his draft to Parkes, Barton and probably Playford as well. This draft was always intended to be a private working document, and was never published.
The National Australasian Convention of 1891 The
Parliament proposed at the Convention of 1891 was to adopt the nomenclature of the
United States Congress; a House of Representatives and a Senate. The House of Representatives was to be elected by districts drawn up on the basis of their population, while in the Senate there was to be equal representation for each "province". This American model was mixed with the
Westminster system by which the
Prime Minister and other ministers would be appointed by the representative of the
British Crown from among the members of the political party holding a majority in the lower House. Griffith identified with great clarity at the Sydney Convention perhaps the greatest problem of all: how to structure the relationship between the lower and upper houses within the Federal Parliament. The main division of opinion centred on the contention of
Alfred Deakin, that the lower house must be supreme, as opposed to the views of Barton,
John Cockburn and others, that a strong Senate with co-ordinate powers was essential. Griffith himself recommended that the doctrine of responsible government should be left open, or substantially modified to accord with the Federal structure. Over the Easter weekend in 1891, Griffith edited Clark's draft aboard the Queensland Government's steam yacht
Lucinda. (Clark was not present, as he was ill with influenza in Sydney). Griffith's draft Constitution was submitted to colonial parliaments but it lapsed in
New South Wales, after which the other colonies were unwilling to proceed.
Griffith or Clark? The importance of the draft Constitution of 1891 was recognised by
John La Nauze when he flatly declared that "The draft of 1891 is the Constitution of 1900, not its father or grandfather." In the twenty-first century, however, a lively debate has sprung up as to whether the principal credit for this draft belongs to Queensland's Sir
Samuel Griffith or Tasmania's
Andrew Inglis Clark. The debate began with the publication of Peter Botsman's ''The Great Constitutional Swindle: A Citizen's Guide to the Australian Constitution
in 2000, and a biography of Andrew Inglis Clark'' by F.M. Neasey and L.J. Neasey published by the University of Tasmania Law Press in 2001. The traditional view attached almost sole responsibility for the 1891 draft to Griffith. Quick and Garran, for instance, state curtly that Griffith "had the chief hand in the actual drafting of the Bill". Given that the authors of this highly respected work were themselves active members of the federal movement, it may be presumed that this view representsif not the complete truththen, at least, the consensus opinion among Australia's "founding fathers". In his 1969 entry on "Clark, Andrew Inglis (1848–1907)" for the
Australian Dictionary of Biography, Henry Reynolds offers a more nuanced view: Clark's supporters are quick to point out that 86 Sections (out of a total of 128) of the final Australian Constitution are recognisable in Clark's draft, but these are potentially misleading statistics. As Professor John Williams has pointed out: As to who was responsible for the actual detailed drafting, as distinct from the broad structure and framework of the 1891 draft, John Williams (for one) is in no doubt: == Australasian Federal Convention of 1897–98 ==