Natives of Karnataka , Meguti
Jain Basadi, Aihole which celebrates
Pulakeshin II's military achievements. , 733–745 AD While opinions vary regarding the early origins of the Chalukyas, the consensus among noted historians such as
John Keay,
D.C. Sircar, Hans Raj, S. Sen,
Kamath,
K. V. Ramesh and Karmarkar is that the founders of the empire at Badami were native to the modern
Karnataka region. A later record of Eastern Chalukyas mentions the northern origin theory and claims one ruler of
Ayodhya came south, defeated the Pallavas and married a Pallava princess. She had a child called Vijayaditya who is claimed to be the
Pulakeshin I's father. However, according to the historians K. V. Ramesh, Chopra and Sastri, there are Badami Chalukya inscriptions that confirm
Jayasimha was Pulakeshin I's grandfather and
Ranaraga, his father. Kamath and
Moraes claim it was a popular practice in the 11th century to link South Indian royal family lineage to a Northern kingdom. The Badami Chalukya records themselves are silent with regards to the Ayodhya origin. While the northern origin theory has been dismissed by many historians, the epigraphist K. V. Ramesh has suggested that an earlier southern migration is a distinct possibility which needs examination. According to him, the complete absence of any inscriptional reference of their family connections to Ayodhya, and their subsequent Kannadiga identity may have been due to their earlier migration into present day Karnataka region where they achieved success as chieftains and kings. Hence, the place of origin of their ancestors may have been of no significance to the kings of the empire who may have considered themselves natives of the Kannada speaking region. The writing of 12th century
Kashmiri poet
Bilhana suggests the Chalukya family belonged to the
Shudra while other sources claim they were born in the arms of Brahma, and hence were
Kshatriya caste. According to
Xuanzang, the Chalukya king
Pulakeshin II was war-like and loved "military arts", because he was a
Kshatriya by birth. The historians Jan Houben and Kamath, and the epigraphist D.C. Sircar note the Badami Chalukya
inscriptions are in
Kannada and
Sanskrit. According to the historian N. L. Rao, their inscriptions call them
Karnatas and their names use indigenous Kannada titles such as
Priyagallam and
Noduttagelvom. The names of some Chalukya princes end with the pure Kannada term
arasa (meaning "king" or "chief"). The
Rashtrakuta inscriptions call the Chalukyas of Badami
Karnatakabala ("Power of Karnataka"). It has been proposed by the historian S. C. Nandinath that the word "Chalukya" originated from
Salki or
Chalki which is a Kannada word for an agricultural implement. The Badami cliff inscription of Pulakeshin I (543), the
Mahakuta Pillar inscription of
Mangalesha (595) and the
Aihole inscription of Pulakeshin II (634) are examples of important Sanskrit inscriptions written in old
Kannada script. The reign of the Chalukyas saw the arrival of Kannada as the predominant language of inscriptions along with Sanskrit, in areas of the Indian peninsula outside what is known as
Tamilakam (Tamil country). Several coins of the Badami Chalukyas with Kannada legends have been found. All this indicates that Kannada language flourished during this period. Travelogues of contemporary foreign travellers have provided useful information about the Chalukyan empire. The Chinese traveller
Xuanzang had visited the court of
Pulakeshin II. At the time of this visit, as mentioned in the
Aihole record, Pulakeshin II had divided his empire into three
Maharashtrakas or great provinces comprising 99,000 villages each. This empire possibly covered present day
Karnataka,
Maharashtra and
coastal Konkan. Xuanzang, impressed with the governance of the empire observed that the benefits of the king's efficient administration was felt far and wide. Later, Persian emperor
Khosrau II exchanged ambassadors with Pulakeshin II.
Legends Court poets of the Western Chalukya dynasty of Kalyani narrate: :"Once when Brahma, the creator, was engaged in the performance of the
sandhya (twilight) rituals, Indra approached and beseeched him to create a hero who could put to an end the increasing evil on earth. On being thus requested, Brahma looked steadily into the
Chuluka-jala (the water of oblation in his palm) and out sprang thence a great warrior, the progenitor of the Chalukyas". The Chalukyas claimed to have been nursed by the
Sapta Matrikas ("seven divine mothers") and were worshippers of many gods including Siva, Vishnu, Chamundi, Surya, Kubera, Parvati, Vinayaka and Kartikeya. Some scholars connect the Chalukyas with the
Chaulukyas (Solankis) of
Gujarat. According to a myth mentioned in latter manuscripts of
Prithviraj Raso, Chaulukyas were born out of fire-pit (Agnikund) at
Mount Abu. However it has been reported that the story of
Agnikula is not mentioned at all in the original version of the
Prithviraj Raso preserved in the Fort Library at
Bikaner. According to the Nilagunda inscription of King Vikramaditya VI (11th century or later), the Chalukyas originally hailed from
Ayodhya where fifty-nine kings ruled, and later, sixteen more of this family ruled from South India where they had migrated. This is repeated by his court poet Bilhana, who claims that the first member of the family, "Chalukya", was so named as he was born in the "hollow of the hands" of God
Brahma. Some genealogical accounts point to an Ayodhya origin and claim that the Chalukyas belonged to the
Solar dynasty. According to a theory put forward by Lewis, the Chalukya were descendants of the "
Seleukia" tribe of
Iraq and that their conflict with the
Pallava of Kanchi was, but a continuation of the conflict between ancient Seleukia and "
Parthians", the proposed ancestors of
Pallavas. However, this theory has been rejected by Kamath as it seeks to build lineages based simply on similar-sounding clan names. == Periods in Chalukya history ==