Origins and establishment of
Arsaces I () with the Greek language inscription ΑΡΣΑΚΟΥ "of Arsaces"|alt=Two sides of a silver coin. The one on the left bears the imprint of a man's head, while the one on the right a sitting individual. Before
Arsaces I founded the Arsacid dynasty, he was chieftain of the
Parni, an ancient
Central Asian tribe of
Iranian peoples and one of several
nomadic tribes within the confederation of the
Dahae. The Parni most likely spoke an
eastern Iranian language, in contrast to the
northwestern Iranian language spoken at the time in
Parthia. The latter was a northeastern province, first under the
Achaemenid Empire, and then the
Seleucid Empire. After conquering the region, the Parni adopted
Parthian as the official court language, speaking it alongside
Middle Persian,
Aramaic,
Greek,
Babylonian,
Sogdian and other languages in the multilingual territories they would conquer. Some academics debate the ethnic origins of Arsaces I, such as Hashem Kazemi and Mostafa Dehpahlavan, who argue that he was a Parthian native rather than a member of the invading Parni. Why the Arsacid court retroactively chose 247 BC as the first year of the Arsacid era is uncertain.
A. D. H. Bivar concludes that this was the year the Seleucids lost control of Parthia to
Andragoras, the appointed
satrap who rebelled against them. Hence, Arsaces I "backdated his
regnal years" to the moment when Seleucid control over Parthia ceased. However, Vesta Sarkhosh Curtis asserts that this was simply the year Arsaces was made chief of the Parni tribe. Homa Katouzian and Gene Ralph Garthwaite claim it was the year Arsaces conquered Parthia and expelled the Seleucid authorities, yet Curtis and Maria Brosius state that Andragoras was not
overthrown by the Arsacids until 238 BC. It is unclear who immediately succeeded Arsaces I. Bivar and Katouzian affirm that it was his brother
Tiridates I of Parthia, who in turn was succeeded by his son
Arsaces II of Parthia in 211 BC. Yet Curtis and Brosius state that Arsaces II was the immediate successor of Arsaces I, with Curtis claiming the succession took place in 211 BC, and Brosius in 217 BC. Bivar insists that 138 BC, the last regnal year of Mithridates I, is "the first precisely established regnal date of Parthian history." Due to these and other discrepancies, Bivar outlines
two distinct royal chronologies accepted by historians. A fictitious claim was later made from the 2nd-century BC onwards by the Parthians, which represented them as descendants of the Achaemenid king of kings,
Artaxerxes II of Persia (). , shaded yellow, alongside the
Seleucid Empire (blue) and the
Roman Republic (purple) around 200 BC|alt=A map centered on the Mediterranean and Middle East showing the extent of the Roman Republic (Purple), Selucid Empire (Blue), and Parthia (Yellow) around 200 BC. For a time, Arsaces I consolidated his position in Parthia and
Hyrcania by taking advantage of the invasion of Seleucid territory in the west by
Ptolemy III Euergetes (
r. 246–222 BC) of
Egypt. This conflict with Ptolemy, the
Third Syrian War (246–241 BC), also allowed
Diodotus I to rebel and form the
Greco-Bactrian Kingdom in Central Asia. The latter's successor,
Diodotus II, formed an alliance with Arsaces I against the Seleucids, but Arsaces was temporarily driven from Parthia by the forces of
Seleucus II Callinicus (). After spending some time in exile among the nomadic
Apasiacae tribe, Arsaces I led a counterattack and recaptured Parthia. Seleucus II's successor,
Antiochus III the Great (), was unable to immediately retaliate because his troops were engaged in putting down the rebellion of
Molon in
Media. Antiochus III launched a massive campaign to retake Parthia and Bactria in 210 or 209 BC. Despite some
victories he was unsuccessful, but did negotiate a peace settlement with Arsaces II. The latter was granted the title of king (
Greek:
basileus) in return for his submission to Antiochus III as his superior. The Seleucids were unable to further intervene in Parthian affairs following increasing encroachment by the
Roman Republic and the Seleucid
defeat at Magnesia in 190 BC.
Priapatius () succeeded Arsaces II, and
Phraates I () eventually ascended the Parthian throne. Phraates I ruled Parthia without further Seleucid interference.
Expansion and consolidation of
Mithridates I, showing him wearing a beard and a royal
diadem on his head. Reverse side:
Heracles/
Verethragna, holding a club in his left hand and a cup in his right hand; Greek inscription reading ΒΑΣΙΛΕΩΣ ΜΕΓΑΛΟΥ ΑΡΣΑΚΟΥ ΦΙΛΕΛΛΗΝΟΣ "of the Great King Arsaces the
Philhellene"|alt=Two sides of a coin. The side on the left showing the head of a bearded man, while the right a standing individual. Phraates I is recorded as expanding Parthia's control past the
Gates of Alexander and occupied
Apamea Ragiana. The locations of these are unknown. Yet the greatest expansion of Parthian power and territory took place during the reign of his brother and successor
Mithridates I (r. c. 171–132 BC), whom Katouzian compares to
Cyrus the Great (d. 530 BC), founder of the Achaemenid Empire. Relations between Parthia and Greco-Bactria deteriorated after the death of Diodotus II, when forces under Mithridates I captured two
eparchies of the latter kingdom, then under
Eucratides I (
r. c. 170–145 BC). Turning his sights on the Seleucid realm, Mithridates I invaded Media and occupied
Ecbatana in 148 or 147 BC; the region had been destabilized by a recent Seleucid suppression of a rebellion there led by
Timarchus. This victory was followed by the Parthian conquest of
Babylonia in
Mesopotamia, where Mithridates I had coins minted at
Seleucia in 141 BC and held an official
investiture ceremony. While Mithridates I retired to Hyrcania, his forces subdued the kingdoms of
Elymais and
Characene and occupied
Susa. By this time, Parthian authority extended as far east as the
Indus River. , Turkmenistan Whereas
Hecatompylos had served as the first Parthian capital, Mithridates I established royal residences at Seleucia, Ecbatana,
Ctesiphon and his newly founded city, Mithradatkert (
Nisa), where the tombs of the Arsacid kings were built and maintained. Ecbatana became the main summertime residence for the Arsacid royalty. Ctesiphon may not have become the official capital until the reign of
Gotarzes I (
r. c. 90–80 BC). It became the site of the royal
coronation ceremony and the representational city of the Arsacids, according to Brosius. The Seleucids were unable to retaliate immediately as general
Diodotus Tryphon led a rebellion at the capital
Antioch in 142 BC. However, by 140 BC
Demetrius II Nicator was able to launch a counter-invasion against the Parthians in Mesopotamia. Despite early successes, the Seleucids were defeated and Demetrius himself was captured by Parthian forces and taken to Hyrcania. There Mithridates I treated his captive with great hospitality; he even married his daughter
Rhodogune of Parthia to Demetrius.
Antiochus VII Sidetes (
r. 138–129 BC), a brother of Demetrius, assumed the Seleucid throne and married the latter's wife
Cleopatra Thea. After defeating Diodotus Tryphon, Antiochus initiated a campaign in 130 BC to retake Mesopotamia, now under the rule of
Phraates II (
r. c. 132–127 BC). The Parthian general Indates was defeated along the
Great Zab, followed by a local uprising where the Parthian governor of Babylonia was killed. Antiochus conquered Babylonia and occupied Susa, where he minted coins. After Antiochus advanced his army into Media, the Parthians pushed for peace, which Antiochus refused to accept unless the Arsacids relinquished all lands to him except Parthia proper, paid heavy tribute, and released Demetrius from captivity. Arsaces released Demetrius and sent him to
Syria, but refused the other demands. By spring 129 BC, the Medes were in open revolt against Antiochus, whose army had exhausted the resources of the countryside during winter. While Antiochus attempted to put down the revolts, the main Parthian force swept into the region and killed Antiochus at the
Battle of Ecbatana in 129 BC. His body was sent back to Syria in a silver coffin; his son Seleucus was made a Parthian hostage and a daughter joined Phraates'
harem. (
r. c. 124–91 BC). Reverse side: seated archer carrying a bow; inscription reading "of the
King of Kings Arsaces the Renowned/Manifest Philhellene." While the Parthians regained the territories lost in the west, another threat arose in the east. In 177–176 BC the nomadic confederation of the
Xiongnu dislodged the nomadic
Yuezhi from their homelands in what is now
Gansu province in
Northwest China; the Yuezhi then migrated west into Bactria and displaced the
Saka (Scythian) tribes. The Saka were forced to move further west, where they invaded the Parthian Empire's northeastern borders. Mithridates I was thus forced to retire to Hyrcania after his conquest of Mesopotamia. Some of the Saka were enlisted in Phraates' forces against Antiochus. However, they arrived too late to engage in the conflict. When Phraates refused to pay their wages, the Saka revolted, which he tried to put down with the aid of former Seleucid soldiers, yet they too abandoned Phraates and joined sides with the Saka. Phraates II marched against this combined force, but he was killed in battle. The Roman historian
Justin reports that his harvp
Artabanus I (
r. c. 128–124 BC) shared a similar fate fighting nomads in the east. He claims Artabanus was killed by the Tokhari (identified as the Yuezhi), although Bivar believes Justin conflated them with the Saka.
Mithridates II (r. c. 124–91 BC) later recovered the lands lost to the Saka in
Sakastan. Chinese
silk from
Mawangdui, 2nd century BC. Silk from
China was perhaps the most lucrative luxury item the Parthians traded at the western end of the
Silk Road. Following the Seleucid withdrawal from Mesopotamia, the Parthian governor of Babylonia, Himerus, was ordered by the Arsacid court to conquer
Characene, then ruled by
Hyspaosines from
Charax Spasinu. When this failed, Hyspaosines invaded Babylonia in 127 BC and occupied Seleucia. Yet by 122 BC, Mithridates II forced Hyspaosines out of Babylonia and made the kings of Characene
vassals under Parthian
suzerainty. After Mithridates II extended Parthian control further west, occupying
Dura-Europos in 113 BC, he became embroiled in a conflict with the
Kingdom of Armenia. His forces defeated and deposed
Artavasdes I of Armenia in 97 BC, taking his son Tigranes hostage, who would later become
Tigranes II "the Great" of Armenia (
r. c. 95–55 BC). The
Indo-Parthian Kingdom, located in modern-day Afghanistan and Pakistan made an alliance with the Parthian Empire in the 1st century BC. Bivar claims that these two states considered each other political equals. After the Greek philosopher
Apollonius of Tyana visited the court of
Vardanes I (
r. c. 40–47 AD) in 42 AD, Vardanes provided him with the protection of a caravan as he traveled to Indo-Parthia. When Apollonius reached Indo-Parthia's capital
Taxila, his caravan leader read Vardanes' official letter, perhaps written in Parthian, to an Indian official who treated Apollonius with great hospitality. Following the
diplomatic venture of
Zhang Qian into Central Asia during the reign of
Emperor Wu of Han (
r. 141–87 BC), the
Han Empire of China sent a delegation to Mithridates II's court in 121 BC. The Han embassy
opened official trade relations with Parthia via the
Silk Road yet did not achieve a desired military alliance against the confederation of the Xiongnu. The Parthian Empire was enriched by taxing the Eurasian caravan trade in
silk, the most highly priced luxury good
imported by the Romans. Pearls were also a highly valued import from China, while the Chinese purchased Parthian spices, perfumes, and fruits. Exotic animals were also given as gifts from the Arsacid to Han courts; in 87 AD
Pacorus II of Parthia sent lions and Persian gazelles to
Emperor Zhang of Han (
r. 75–88 AD). Besides silk, Parthian goods purchased by Roman merchants included
iron from India,
spices, and fine leather. Caravans traveling through the Parthian Empire brought West Asian and sometimes
Roman luxury glasswares to China. The merchants of
Sogdia, speaking an
Eastern Iranian language, served as the primary middlemen of this vital silk trade between
Parthia and Han China.
Rome and Armenia The Yuezhi
Kushan Empire in northern India largely guaranteed the security of Parthia's eastern border. Thus, from the mid-1st century BC onwards, the Arsacid court focused on securing the western border, primarily against Rome. A year following Mithridates II's subjugation of Armenia,
Lucius Cornelius Sulla, the Roman
proconsul of
Cilicia, convened with the Parthian diplomat
Orobazus at the
Euphrates river. The two agreed that the river would serve as the border between Parthia and Rome, although several historians have argued that Sulla only had authority to communicate these terms back to Rome. Despite this agreement, in 93 or 92 BC Parthia fought a war in Syria against the tribal leader
Laodice and her Seleucid ally
Antiochus X Eusebes (
r. 95–92? BC), killing the latter. When one of the last Seleucid monarchs,
Demetrius III Eucaerus, attempted to besiege Beroea (modern
Aleppo), Parthia sent military aid to the inhabitants and Demetrius was defeated. Following the rule of Mithridates II, his son
Gotarzes I succeeded him. He reigned during a period coined in scholarship as the "
Parthian Dark Age", due to the lack of clear information on the events of this period in the empire, except a series of, apparently overlapping, reigns. It is only with the beginning of the reign of
Orodes II in , that the line of Parthian rulers can again be reliably traced. This system of split monarchy weakened Parthia, allowing Tigranes II of Armenia to annex Parthian territory in western Mesopotamia. This land would not be restored to Parthia until the reign of
Sinatruces (
r. c. 78–69 BC). Following the outbreak of the
Third Mithridatic War,
Mithridates VI of Pontus (
r. 119–63 BC), an ally of Tigranes II of Armenia, requested aid from Parthia against Rome, but Sinatruces refused help. When the Roman commander
Lucullus marched against the Armenian capital
Tigranocerta in 69 BC, Mithridates VI and Tigranes II requested the aid of
Phraates III (
r. c. 71–58). Phraates did not send aid to either, and after the
fall of Tigranocerta he reaffirmed with Lucullus the Euphrates as the boundary between Parthia and Rome.
Tigranes the Younger, son of Tigranes II of Armenia, failed to usurp the Armenian throne from his father. He fled to Phraates III and convinced him to march against Armenia's new capital at
Artaxata. When this siege failed, Tigranes the Younger once again fled, this time to the Roman commander
Pompey. He promised Pompey that he would act as a guide through Armenia, but, when Tigranes II submitted to Rome as a
client king, Tigranes the Younger was brought to Rome as a hostage. Phraates demanded Pompey return Tigranes the Younger to him, but Pompey refused. In retaliation, Phraates launched an invasion into
Corduene (southeastern Turkey) where, according to two conflicting Roman accounts, the Roman consul
Lucius Afranius forced the Parthians out by either military or diplomatic means. Phraates III was assassinated by his sons
Orodes II of Parthia and
Mithridates IV of Parthia, after which Orodes turned on Mithridates, forcing him to flee from Media to
Roman Syria.
Aulus Gabinius, the Roman proconsul of Syria, marched in support of Mithridates to the Euphrates, but had to turn back to aid
Ptolemy XII Auletes (
r. 80–58; 55–51 BC) against a rebellion in Egypt. Despite losing his Roman support, Mithridates managed to conquer Babylonia, and minted coins at Seleucia until 54 BC. In that year, Orodes' general, known only as
Surena after his noble family's clan name, recaptured Seleucia, and Mithridates was executed. , who was
defeated at Carrhae by
Surena Marcus Licinius Crassus, one of the
triumvirs, who was now proconsul of Syria, invaded Parthia in 53 BC in belated support of Mithridates. As his army
marched to Carrhae (modern
Harran, southeastern Turkey), Orodes II invaded Armenia, cutting off support from Rome's ally
Artavasdes II of Armenia (
r. 53–34 BC). Orodes persuaded Artavasdes to a marriage alliance between the crown prince
Pacorus I of Parthia (d. 38 BC) and Artavasdes' sister. Surena, with an army entirely on horseback, rode to meet Crassus. Surena's 1,000
cataphracts (armed with lances) and 9,000
horse archers were outnumbered roughly four to one by Crassus' army, comprising seven
Roman legions and auxiliaries including mounted
Gauls and light infantry. Using a baggage train of about 1,000 camels, the Parthian army provided the horse archers with a constant supply of arrows. The horse archers employed the "
Parthian shot" tactic: feigning retreat to draw enemy out, then turning and shooting at them when exposed. This tactic, executed with heavy
composite bows on the flat plain, devastated Crassus' infantry. With some 20,000 Romans dead, approximately 10,000 captured, and roughly another 10,000 escaping west, Crassus fled into the Armenian countryside. At the head of his army, Surena approached Crassus, offering a
parley, which Crassus accepted. However, he was killed when one of his junior officers, suspecting a trap, attempted to stop him from riding into Surena's camp. Crassus' defeat at Carrhae was one of the worst military defeats of Roman history. Parthia's victory cemented its reputation as a formidable if not equal power with Rome. With his camp followers, war captives, and precious Roman booty, Surena traveled some 700 km (430 mi) back to Seleucia where his victory was celebrated. However, fearing his ambitions even for the Arsacid throne, Orodes had Surena executed shortly thereafter. bearing the portraits of
Mark Antony (left) and
Octavian (right), issued in 41 BC to celebrate the establishment of the
Second Triumvirate by Octavian, Antony and
Marcus Lepidus in 43 BC Emboldened by the victory over Crassus, the Parthians attempted to capture Roman-held territories in
West Asia.
Crown prince Pacorus I and his commander Osaces raided Syria as far as Antioch in 51 BC, but were repulsed by
Gaius Cassius Longinus, who ambushed and killed Osaces. The Arsacids sided with Pompey in
the civil war against Julius Caesar and even sent troops to support the anti-Caesarian forces at the
Battle of Philippi in 42 BC.
Quintus Labienus, a general loyal to Cassius and
Brutus, sided with Parthia against the
Second Triumvirate in 40 BC; the following year he
invaded Syria alongside Pacorus I. The triumvir
Mark Antony was unable to lead the Roman defense against Parthia due to his departure to Italy, where he amassed his forces to confront his rival
Octavian and eventually
conducted negotiations with him at
Brundisium. After Syria was occupied by Pacorus' army, Labienus split from the main Parthian force to invade
Anatolia while Pacorus and his commander
Barzapharnes invaded the Roman
Levant. They subdued all settlements along the Mediterranean coast as far south as Ptolemais (modern
Acre, Israel), with the lone exception of
Tyre. In
Judea, the pro-Roman Jewish forces of high priest
Hyrcanus II,
Phasael, and
Herod were defeated by the Parthians and their Jewish ally
Antigonus II Mattathias (r. 40–37 BC); the latter was made king of Judea while Herod fled to his fort at
Masada. Despite these successes, the Parthians were soon driven out of the Levant by a Roman counteroffensive.
Publius Ventidius Bassus, an officer under Mark Antony, defeated and then executed Labienus at the
Battle of the Cilician Gates (in modern
Mersin Province, Turkey) in 39 BC. Shortly afterward, a Parthian force in Syria led by general Pharnapates was defeated by Ventidius at the
Battle of Amanus Pass. As a result, Pacorus I temporarily withdrew from Syria. When he returned in the spring of 38 BC, he faced Ventidius at the
Battle of Mount Gindarus, northeast of Antioch. Pacorus was killed during the battle, and his forces retreated across the Euphrates. His death spurred a succession crisis in which Orodes II chose
Phraates IV (
r. c. 38–2 BC) as his new heir. (
r. c. 38–2 BC). Inscription reading ΒΑΣΙΛΕΩΣ ΒΑΣΙΛΕΩΝ ΑΡΣΑΚΟΥ ΕΥΕΡΓΕΤΟΥ ΕΠΙΦΑΝΟΥΣ ΦΙΛΕΛΛΗΝΟΣ "of the
King of Kings Arsaces the Renowned/Manifest Benefactor Philhellene" Upon assuming the throne, Phraates IV eliminated rival claimants by killing and exiling his own brothers. One of them,
Monaeses, fled to Antony and persuaded him to
invade Parthia. Antony defeated Parthia's Judaean ally Antigonus in 37 BC, installing Herod as a client king in his place. The following year, when Antony marched to
Theodosiopolis, Artavasdes II of Armenia once again switched alliances by sending Antony additional troops. Antony invaded Media
Atropatene (modern
Iranian Azerbaijan), then ruled by Parthia's ally
Artavasdes I of Media Atropatene, with the intention of seizing the capital Praaspa, the location of which is now unknown. However, Phraates IV ambushed Antony's rear detachment, destroying a giant
battering ram meant for the siege of Praaspa; after this, Artavasdes II abandoned Antony's forces. The Parthians pursued and harassed Antony's army as it fled to Armenia. Eventually, the greatly weakened force reached Syria. Antony lured Artavasdes II into a trap with the promise of a marriage alliance. He was taken captive in 34 BC, paraded in Antony's mock
Roman triumph in
Alexandria, Egypt, and eventually executed by
Cleopatra VII of the
Ptolemaic Kingdom. Antony attempted to strike an alliance with Artavasdes I of Media Atropatene, whose relations with Phraates IV had recently soured. This was abandoned when Antony and his forces withdrew from Armenia in 33 BC; they escaped a Parthian invasion while Antony's rival Octavian attacked his forces to the west. After the defeat and suicides of Antony and Cleopatra in 30 BC, Parthian ally
Artaxias II reassumed the throne of Armenia.
Peace with Rome, court intrigue, and contact with Chinese generals Following the defeat and deaths of Antony and
Cleopatra of
Ptolemaic Egypt after the
Battle of Actium in 31 BC, Octavian consolidated his political power and in 27 BC was named
Augustus by the
Roman Senate, becoming the first
Roman emperor. Around this time,
Tiridates II of Parthia briefly overthrew Phraates IV, who was able to quickly reestablish his rule with the aid of Scythian nomads. Tiridates fled to the Romans, taking one of Phraates' sons with him. In negotiations conducted in 20 BC, Phraates arranged for the release of his kidnapped son. In return, the Romans received the lost
legionary standards taken at Carrhae in 53 BC, as well as any surviving prisoners of war. The Parthians viewed this exchange as a small price to pay to regain the prince. Augustus hailed the return of the standards as a political victory over Parthia; this propaganda was celebrated in the minting of new coins, the
building of a new temple to house the standards, and even in fine art such as the
breastplate scene on his statue
Augustus of Prima Porta. on the statue of
Augustus of Prima Porta, showing a Parthian man returning to
Augustus the
legionary standards lost by
Marcus Licinius Crassus at
Carrhae Along with the prince, Augustus also gave Phraates IV an Italian slave-girl, who later became Queen
Musa of Parthia. To ensure that her child Phraataces would inherit the throne without incident, Musa convinced Phraates IV to give his other sons to Augustus as hostages. Again, Augustus used this as propaganda depicting the submission of Parthia to Rome, listing it as a great accomplishment in his
Res Gestae Divi Augusti. When Phraataces took the throne as
Phraates V (
r. c. 2 BC – 4 AD), Musa ruled alongside him, and according to
Josephus, married him. The Parthian nobility, disapproving of the notion of a king with non-Arsacid blood, forced the pair into exile in Roman territory. Phraates' successor
Orodes III of Parthia lasted just two years on the throne, and was followed by
Vonones I, who had adopted many Roman mannerisms during time in Rome. The Parthian nobility, angered by Vonones' sympathies for the Romans, backed a rival claimant,
Artabanus II of Parthia (
r. c. 10–38 AD), who eventually defeated Vonones and drove him into exile in Roman Syria. During the reign of Artabanus II, two Jewish commoners and brothers,
Anilai and Asinai from
Nehardea (near modern
Fallujah, Iraq), led a revolt against the Parthian governor of Babylonia. After defeating the latter, the two were granted the right to govern the region by Artabanus II, who feared further rebellion elsewhere. Anilai's Parthian wife poisoned Asinai out of fear he would attack Anilai over his marriage to a
gentile. Following this, Anilai became embroiled in an armed conflict with a son-in-law of Artabanus, who eventually defeated him. With the Jewish regime removed, the native Babylonians began to harass the
local Jewish community, forcing them to emigrate to Seleucia. When that city rebelled against Parthian rule in 35–36 AD, the Jews were expelled again, this time by the local
Greeks and
Aramaeans. The exiled Jews fled to Ctesiphon, Nehardea, and
Nisibis. struck in 19 BC during the reign of
Augustus, with the goddess
Feronia depicted on the obverse, and on the reverse a Parthian man kneeling in submission while offering the Roman
military standards taken at the
Battle of Carrhae Although at peace with Parthia, Rome still interfered in its affairs. The Roman emperor
Tiberius (r. 14–37 AD) became involved in a plot by
Pharasmanes I of Iberia to place his brother
Mithridates on the throne of Armenia by assassinating the Parthian ally King Arsaces of Armenia. Artabanus II tried and failed to restore Parthian control of Armenia, prompting an aristocratic revolt that forced him to flee to
Scythia. The Romans released a hostage prince,
Tiridates III of Parthia, to rule the region as an ally of Rome. Shortly before his death, Artabanus managed to force Tiridates from the throne using troops from Hyrcania. After Artabanus' death in 38 AD, a long civil war ensued between the rightful successor
Vardanes I and his brother
Gotarzes II. After Vardanes was assassinated during a hunting expedition, the Parthian nobility appealed to Roman emperor
Claudius (
r. 41–54 AD) in 49 AD to release the hostage prince
Meherdates to challenge Gotarzes. This backfired when Meherdates was betrayed by the governor of
Edessa and
Izates bar Monobaz of
Adiabene; he was captured and sent to Gotarzes, where he was allowed to live after having his ears mutilated, an act that disqualified him from inheriting the throne. In 97 AD, the Chinese general
Ban Chao, the
Protector-General of the Western Regions, sent his emissary
Gan Ying on a diplomatic mission to reach the Roman Empire. Gan visited the court of
Pacorus II at Hecatompylos before departing towards Rome. He traveled as far west as the
Persian Gulf, where Parthian authorities convinced him that an arduous sea voyage around the
Arabian Peninsula was the only means to reach Rome. Discouraged by this, Gan Ying returned to the Han court and provided
Emperor He of Han (
r. 88–105 AD) with a detailed report on the Roman Empire based on oral accounts of his Parthian hosts. William Watson speculates that the Parthians would have been relieved at the failed efforts by the Han Empire to open diplomatic relations with Rome, especially after Ban Chao's
military victories against the
Xiongnu in
eastern Central Asia. However, Chinese records maintain that a
Roman embassy, perhaps only a group of
Roman merchants, arrived at the Han capital
Luoyang by way of
Jiaozhi (northern
Vietnam) in 166 AD, during the reigns of
Marcus Aurelius (
r. 161–180 AD) and
Emperor Huan of Han (
r. 146–168 AD). Although it could be coincidental,
Antonine Roman golden
medallions dated to the reigns of Marcus Aurelius and his predecessor
Antoninus Pius have been discovered at
Oc Eo, Vietnam (among other Roman artefacts in the
Mekong Delta), a site that is one of the suggested locations for the port city of "
Cattigara" along the
Magnus Sinus (i.e.
Gulf of Thailand and
South China Sea) in
Ptolemy's
Geography.
Continuation of Roman hostilities and Parthian decline AD over the
Kingdom of Armenia, detailing the Roman offensive into
Armenia and capture of the country by
Gnaeus Domitius Corbulo -
Verethragna.
Masdjid-e Suleiman,
Iran. 2nd–3rd century AD. Louvre Museum Sb 7302. After the
Iberian king Pharasmanes I had his son
Rhadamistus (
r. 51–55 AD) invade Armenia to depose the Roman client king Mithridates,
Vologases I of Parthia (
r. c. 51–77 AD) planned to invade and place his brother, the later
Tiridates I of Armenia, on the throne. Rhadamistus was eventually driven from power, and, beginning with the reign of Tiridates, Parthia would retain firm control over Armenia—with brief interruptions—through the
Arsacid dynasty of Armenia. Even after the fall of the Parthian Empire, the Arsacid line lived on through the Armenian kings. However, not only did the Arsacid line continue through the Armenians, it also continued through the
Georgian kings with the
Arsacid dynasty of Iberia, and for many centuries afterwards in
Caucasian Albania through the
Arsacid dynasty of Caucasian Albania. When
Vardanes II of Parthia rebelled against his father Vologases I in 55 AD, Vologases withdrew his forces from Armenia. Rome quickly attempted to fill the political vacuum left behind. In the
Roman–Parthian War of 58–63 AD, the commander
Gnaeus Domitius Corbulo achieved some military successes against the Parthians while installing
Tigranes VI of Armenia as a Roman client. However, Corbulo's successor
Lucius Caesennius Paetus was soundly defeated by Parthian forces and fled Armenia. Following a peace treaty, Tiridates I traveled to
Naples and Rome in 63 AD. At both sites the Roman emperor
Nero (
r. 54–68 AD) ceremoniously crowned him king of Armenia by placing the royal
diadem on his head. A long period of peace between Parthia and Rome ensued, with only the invasion of
Alans into Parthia's eastern territories around 72 AD mentioned by Roman historians. Whereas Augustus and Nero had chosen a cautious military policy when confronting Parthia, later Roman emperors invaded and attempted to conquer the eastern
Fertile Crescent, the heart of the Parthian Empire along the
Tigris and
Euphrates. The heightened aggression can be explained in part by Rome's military reforms. To match Parthia's strength in missile troops and mounted warriors, the Romans at first used foreign allies (especially
Nabataeans), but later established a permanent
auxilia force to complement their heavy legionary infantry. The Romans eventually maintained regiments of horse archers (
sagittarii) and even mail-armored
cataphracts in their eastern provinces. Yet the Romans had no discernible
grand strategy in dealing with Parthia and gained very little territory from these invasions. The primary motivations for war were the advancement of the personal glory and political position of the emperor, as well as defending Roman honor against perceived slights such as Parthian interference in the affairs of Rome's client states. of Parthian king at
Behistun, most likely
Vologases III (
r. c. 110–147 AD) Hostilities between Rome and Parthia were renewed when
Osroes I of Parthia (
r. c. 109–128 AD) deposed the Armenian king
Sanatruk and replaced him with
Axidares, son of Pacorus II, without consulting Rome. The Roman emperor
Trajan (
r. 98–117 AD) had the next Parthian nominee for the throne,
Parthamasiris, killed in 114 AD, instead making Armenia a Roman province. His forces, led by
Lusius Quietus, also captured Nisibis; its occupation was essential to securing all the major routes across the northern Mesopotamian plain. The following year, Trajan invaded Mesopotamia and met little resistance from only
Meharaspes of Adiabene, since Osroes was engaged in a civil war to the east with
Vologases III of Parthia. Trajan spent the winter of 115–116 at Antioch, but resumed his campaign in the spring. Marching down the Euphrates, he captured Dura-Europos, the capital Ctesiphon and Seleucia, and even subjugated Characene, where he watched ships depart to India from the
Persian Gulf. In the last months of 116 AD, Trajan captured the Persian city of Susa. When
Sanatruces II of Parthia gathered forces in eastern Parthia to challenge the Romans, his cousin
Parthamaspates of Parthia betrayed and killed him: Trajan crowned him the new king of Parthia. Never again would the Roman Empire advance so far to the east. On Trajan's return north, the Babylonian settlements revolted against the Roman garrisons. Trajan was forced to retreat from Mesopotamia in 117 AD, overseeing a failed siege of
Hatra during his withdrawal. His retreat was—in his intentions—temporary, because he wanted to renew the attack on Parthia in 118 AD and "make the subjection of the Parthians a reality," but Trajan died suddenly in August 117 AD. During his campaign, Trajan was granted the title
Parthicus by the Senate and coins were minted proclaiming the conquest of Parthia. However, only the 4th-century AD historians
Eutropius and
Festus allege that he attempted to establish a
Roman province in lower Mesopotamia. , depicted as a prisoner of war in chains held by a Roman (left);
Arch of Septimius Severus, Rome, 203 AD Trajan's successor
Hadrian (
r. 117–138 AD) reaffirmed the
Roman-Parthian border at the Euphrates, choosing not to invade Mesopotamia due to Rome's now limited military resources. Parthamaspates fled after the Parthians revolted against him, yet the Romans made him king of
Osroene. Osroes I died during his conflict with Vologases III, the latter succeeded by
Vologases IV of Parthia (
r. c. 147–191 AD) who ushered in a period of peace and stability. However, the
Roman–Parthian War of 161–166 AD began when Vologases invaded Armenia and Syria, retaking Edessa. Roman emperor
Marcus Aurelius (
r. 161–180 AD) had co-ruler
Lucius Verus (
r. 161–169 AD) guard Syria while
Marcus Statius Priscus invaded Armenia in 163 AD, followed by the invasion of Mesopotamia by
Avidius Cassius in 164 AD. The Romans captured and burnt Seleucia and Ctesiphon to the ground, yet they were forced to retreat once the Roman soldiers contracted a
deadly disease (possibly
smallpox) that soon ravaged the Roman world. Although they withdrew, from this point forward the city of Dura-Europos remained in Roman hands. When Roman emperor
Septimius Severus (
r. 193–211 AD) invaded Mesopotamia in 197 AD during the reign of
Vologases V of Parthia (
r. c. 191–208 AD), the Romans once again marched down the Euphrates and captured Seleucia and Ctesiphon. After assuming the title
Parthicus Maximus, he retreated in late 198 AD, failing as Trajan once did to capture Hatra during a siege. Around 212 AD, soon after
Vologases VI of Parthia (
r. c. 208–222 AD) took the throne, his brother
Artabanus IV of Parthia (d. 224 AD) rebelled against him and gained control over a greater part of the empire. Meanwhile, the Roman emperor
Caracalla (
r. 211–217 AD) deposed the kings of Osroene and Armenia to make them Roman provinces once more. He marched into Mesopotamia under the pretext of marrying one of Artabanus' daughters, but the marriage was not allowed. Consequently, Caracalla made war on Parthia, conquering
Arbil and sacking the Parthian tombs there. Caracalla was assassinated the next year on the road to Carrhae by his soldiers. At the
Battle of Nisibis, the Parthians were able to defeat the Romans, but both sides suffered heavy losses. After this debacle, the Parthians made a settlement with
Macrinus (
r. 217–218) where the Romans paid Parthia over two-hundred million
denarii with additional gifts. The Parthian Empire, weakened by internal strife and wars with Rome, was soon to be followed by the
Sasanian Empire. Indeed, shortly afterward,
Ardashir I, the local Iranian ruler of Persis (modern
Fars province, Iran) from
Istakhr began subjugating the surrounding territories in defiance of Arsacid rule. He confronted Artabanus IV at the
Battle of Hormozdgān on 28 April 224 AD, perhaps at a site near
Isfahan, defeating him and establishing the Sasanian Empire. There is evidence, however, that suggests Vologases VI continued to mint coins at Seleucia as late as 228 AD. The Sassanians would not only assume Parthia's legacy as Rome's Persian nemesis, but they would also attempt to restore the boundaries of the Achaemenid Empire by
briefly conquering the Levant, Anatolia, and Egypt from the
Eastern Roman Empire during the reign of
Khosrau II (
r. 590–628 AD). However, they would lose these territories to
Heraclius—the last Roman emperor before the
Arab conquests. Nevertheless, for a period of more than 400 years, they succeeded the Parthian realm as Rome's principal rival.
Native and external sources Local and foreign written accounts, as well as non-textual artifacts, have been used to reconstruct Parthian history. Although the Parthian court maintained records, the Parthians had no formal study of
history; the earliest
universal history of Iran, the
Khwaday-Namag, was not compiled until the reign of the last Sasanian ruler
Yazdegerd III (r. 632–651 AD). Indigenous
sources on Parthian history remain scarce, with fewer of them available than for any other period of Iranian history. Most contemporary written records on Parthia contain Greek as well as Parthian and Aramaic inscriptions. The Parthian language was written in a distinct script derived from the
Imperial Aramaic chancellery script of the Achaemenids, and later developed into the
Pahlavi writing system. The most valuable indigenous sources for reconstructing an accurate chronology of Arsacid rulers are the metal
drachma coins issued by each ruler. These represent a "transition from non-textual to textual remains," according to historian
Geo Widengren. Other Parthian sources used for reconstructing chronology include
cuneiform astronomical tablets and colophons discovered in Babylonia. Indigenous textual sources also include stone
inscriptions,
parchment and
papyri documents, and pottery
ostraca. Along with parchment documents found at sites like Dura-Europos, these also provide valuable information on Parthian governmental administration, covering issues such as taxation, military titles, and provincial organization. ,
Khuzestan Province, Iran,
National Museum of Iran The
Greek and
Latin histories, which represent the majority of materials covering Parthian history, are not considered entirely reliable since they were written from the perspective of rivals and wartime enemies. These external sources generally concern major military and political events, and often ignore social and cultural aspects of Parthian history. The Romans usually depicted the Parthians as fierce warriors but also as a culturally refined people; recipes for Parthian dishes in the cookbook
Apicius exemplifies their admiration for Parthian cuisine.
Apollodorus of Artemita and
Arrian wrote histories focusing on Parthia, which are now lost and survive only as quoted extracts in other histories.
Isidore of Charax, who lived during the reign of Augustus, provides an account of Parthian territories, perhaps from a Parthian government survey. To a lesser extent, people and events of Parthian history were also included in the histories of
Justin,
Strabo,
Diodorus Siculus,
Plutarch,
Cassius Dio,
Appian,
Josephus,
Pliny the Elder, and
Herodian. Parthian history can also be reconstructed via the
Chinese historical records of events. In contrast to Greek and Roman histories, the early Chinese histories maintained a more neutral view when describing Parthia, although the habit of Chinese chroniclers to copy material for their accounts from older works (of undetermined origin) makes it difficult to establish a chronological order of events. The Chinese called Parthia '''', perhaps after the Greek name for the Parthian city
Antiochia in Margiana (Greek: Ἀντιόχεια ἡ ἐν τῇ Μαργιανῇ). However, this could also have been a transliteration of "Arsaces", after the dynasty's eponymous founder. The works and historical authors include the
Shiji (also known as the
Records of the Grand Historian) by
Sima Qian, the
Han shu (Book of Han) by
Ban Biao,
Ban Gu, and
Ban Zhao, and the
Hou Han shu (Book of Later Han) by
Fan Ye. They provide information on the nomadic migrations leading up to the early
Saka invasion of Parthia and valuable political and geographical information. The
Shiji also mentions that the Parthians kept records by "writing horizontally on strips of leather," that is, parchment. In Islamic sources, the Parthian dynasty is mentioned with three dynastic branch names: Aškāniān (اشکانیان), Ašġāniān (اشغانیان), and Afquršāhān (افقورشاهان). The obvious differences between the names of Parthian dynastic branches in Islamic sources has been forgotten by modern Persian-speaking historians. Intentionally or unintentionally, because the translators and correctors of Arabic to Persian sources changed the letter "ġ" (غ) to "k" (ک) in all historical texts and also changed the word of "Persia" to "Iran", the true intention of the Islamic historical sources have been forgotten. As the consequence, these different dynastic branches have become a single dynasty in the form of the name Aškāniān (اشکانیان) in the new editions of Islamic sources. It is known, however, that the Arsacid royal family line survived within three ruling dynasties belonging to
Armenia,
Caucasian Iberia, and
Aghbania in the Caucasus. ==Government and administration==