Republicans, Trump and the Trump administration Trump applauded the construction and highlighted its private funding. House speaker
Mike Johnson also highlighted the many construction projects in the history of the White House and stated, "President Trump’s going to have the greatest improvement of the White House in the history of the building." House majority leader
Steve Scalise also referenced the many prior renovations and anticipated that the Democratic Party would object to any idea of Trump's. First Lady
Melania Trump, though reportedly having expressed concern in private over the demolition of the East Wing, did not release a statement on the construction of the ballroom.
Democrats On October 21, shortly after the construction began, former first lady and 2016 presidential candidate
Hillary Clinton posted about the construction on Twitter, stating, "It's not his house. It's your house. And he's destroying it." Representative
Jamie Raskin tweeted a picture of the construction linking it to the
War of 1812 when the
White House was set on fire by British troops and how Trump was also destroying the White House while fashioning himself as a king. The White House is exempt from the review process of the
National Historic Preservation Act of 1966. The building is overseen by non-binding recommendations of the
Committee for the Preservation of the White House. Ever since the National Capital Planning Commission (NCPC) was tasked with reviewing federal development projects in Washington, D.C., in 1952, updates to the White House by US presidents have seen voluntary submission of their plans to the NCPC prior to the beginning of construction. The suit aims to force President Trump pause the project until he has submitted the plans to several bodies and Congress for public review and input. The Trump administration replied that the ballroom construction must continue for classified reasons of national security that may be shared with the judge but not with the plaintiffs. In mid-December, the Trump administration told a federal judge that it would submit plans for review by the end of December to two oversight bodies established by Congress, the NCPC and the
Commission of Fine Arts (CFA). On February 19, 2026, the CFA appointed by Trump approved the renovation by a vote of 6–0.
Ethical Ethics experts express concern over the private funding of the renovation and possible
conflicts of interest and attempts by donors to influence the president; the White House did not answer whether a competitive bidding process was followed. In September it was revealed that
Alphabet, the multinational technology conglomerate holding company and the third-largest technology company by revenue, owner of Google, is a donor to the ballroom project. Alphabet donated $22 million towards construction as part of a settlement for a lawsuit Trump filed in 2021 accusing the company of violating his
First Amendment rights. Aside from Alphabet, the
Associated Press reported on October 21 that the White House had not yet fulfilled their promise to publish a full list of donors funding the ballroom project. It did so on October 22.
The Hill described the timing of the renovations as poor, coming in amidst poor jobs reports and concerns over the impact of
Trump's tariffs on the greater economy.
Public According to a
YouGov poll released on October 22, the majority of polled Americans disapproved of the decision to demolish the East Wing as part of the renovation at 53%, with only 24% of respondents indicated that they approved. In the follow up question about the plans to renovate and build additions to the White House including the new ballroom, 50% indicated that they disapproved of the plans with only 33% indicating that they approved. A joint
Washington Post-
ABC News-
Ipsos conducted October 24–28 found that 56% of Americans polled opposed the project, while 28% approved and 16% were undecided. When the poll was repeated six months later, those numbers were unchanged. A
New York Times analysis found that 98% of the 32,000 public comments on the plan were negative, leading the
National Capital Planning Commission to announce on March 5, 2026 that it would delay its vote to April 2.
Paul Goldberger, the former architecture critic for
The New York Times and
The New Yorker and the author of "Why Architecture Matters", called the design an "enormous, banal box". == See also ==